2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of pesticide exposure from consumption of domestic and imported fruits and vegetables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these compounds are toxic to humans at certain levels and their presence in the diet may be a health concern to humans (Bjørling- Poulsen, Andersen, & Grandjean, 2008;Breckenridge et al, 2009;CODEX, 2009;Mendes, Mendes, Cipullo, & Burdmann, 2005;Menegola, Broccia, Di Renzo, & Giavini, 2006;USEPA, 2001). In addition to providing data to assess whether the product is being applied to the crop according to the instructions on the approved labels (compliance with MRL), pesticide residue monitoring program data can also be used to assess the human health risk from exposure to pesticide through the diet (Claeys et al, 2011;Caldas & Souza, 2004;Jensen et al, 2009;Katz & Winter, 2009). Furthermore, the cumulative exposure to multiple residues with the same mechanism of action (organophosphate and carbamates, AChE inhibitors, and triazoles, sterol 14-demethylase inhibitors) can lead to unsafe intake of these compounds in the diet Caldas, Tresssou et al, 2006, EFSA, 2010USEPA, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these compounds are toxic to humans at certain levels and their presence in the diet may be a health concern to humans (Bjørling- Poulsen, Andersen, & Grandjean, 2008;Breckenridge et al, 2009;CODEX, 2009;Mendes, Mendes, Cipullo, & Burdmann, 2005;Menegola, Broccia, Di Renzo, & Giavini, 2006;USEPA, 2001). In addition to providing data to assess whether the product is being applied to the crop according to the instructions on the approved labels (compliance with MRL), pesticide residue monitoring program data can also be used to assess the human health risk from exposure to pesticide through the diet (Claeys et al, 2011;Caldas & Souza, 2004;Jensen et al, 2009;Katz & Winter, 2009). Furthermore, the cumulative exposure to multiple residues with the same mechanism of action (organophosphate and carbamates, AChE inhibitors, and triazoles, sterol 14-demethylase inhibitors) can lead to unsafe intake of these compounds in the diet Caldas, Tresssou et al, 2006, EFSA, 2010USEPA, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each residue file consisted of sample-specific findings (both detections and nondetections) for all residue determinations. Residue findings considered as nondetections were assigned a value of zero, using the same approach taken by Katz and Winter [5], rather than using the much more conservative approach of considering nondetectable residues as being to one-half of the detection limits. Exposure estimates were made using LifeLine probabilistic modeling software (LifeLine software version 5.0, Annandale, VA, http://www.thelifelinegroup.org/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When pesticide residues exceed the MRL that is established specifically for a particular pesticide on a particular food item, they will constitute a violation of legal limits and the more common form of violative residues occur when they are detected on a food item for which a tolerance has not been established (Katz & Winter, 2009). The 23 pesticide residues resulted in 89 violations, six pesticides (carbaryl, biphenyl, carbofuran, propoxur, tolcofos-methyl and azobenzene) were responsible for 63 (71%) of these violations.…”
Section: Pesticidementioning
confidence: 98%