2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of permeability models using mercury injection capillary pressure data on carbonate rock samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected these samples because it is well documented that carbonates exhibit multiple sizes and distribution of pores within the pore systems and include large degrees of microporosity. [42][43][44][45][46] This poses a challenge when analyzing and quantifying porosity using techniques such as image analysis from petrographic thin sections ( Fig. 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected these samples because it is well documented that carbonates exhibit multiple sizes and distribution of pores within the pore systems and include large degrees of microporosity. [42][43][44][45][46] This poses a challenge when analyzing and quantifying porosity using techniques such as image analysis from petrographic thin sections ( Fig. 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permeability is one of the most important parameters for reservoir characterization and productivity prediction. There are many well established theoretical and empirical methods to predict the permeability combining conventional MICP parameters and the fractal dimension [ Swanson , ; Katz and Thompson , ; Hunt , ; Hunt and Gee , ; Yu and Liu , ; Glover et al ., ; Yang and Aplin , ; Xu and Yu , ; Abojafer , ; Othman et al ., ; Zinovik and Poulikakos , ; Latief and Fauzi , ; Rezaee et al ., ; Gao and Hu , ; Buiting and Clerke , ; Nooruddin et al ., ; Lala , ; Cai et al ., ; Miao et al ., ].…”
Section: Algorithm and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneity and anisotropy of pore structures are involved in the CPC; thus, the CPC has been applied to a wide range of natural or synthetic porous media, such as shale, tight sandstone, carbonate rock, packing bed, coal rock, cement slurry, and fine sediment containing natural gas hydrate (Cai et al, ; Lei & Santamarina, ; Sang et al, ; Voigt et al, ; Wyrzykowski et al, ). From the equivalent hydraulic size distribution of the pore‐throat (SDPT) given by the CPC, many critical pore structure parameters, such as the threshold pressure and radius, the maximum displacement pressure P d and its corresponding maximum pore‐throat radius r max , the average pore‐throat radius r mean , the irreducible water saturation S wir , the structural coefficient T , and the pore‐throat radius at any saturation (e.g., r 15 , r 25 , r 50 ), can be directly determined (Nooruddin et al, ). Recently, Nishiyama and Yokoyama () reported that the critical radius from the CPC is the radius of the largest sphere that can move freely in porous media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the CPC may be applied to the migration of solutes in groundwater. Thus, the CPC has been used to successfully evaluate many macroscopic petrophysical properties for formation estimation and reservoir simulation, such as permeability (Nooruddin et al, 2014;Rashid et al, 2015;Rezaee et al, 2012), electrical conductivity and cementation factors (Katz & Thompson, 1987;Shahsenov & Orujov, 2018), and even relative permeability curves (Li & Horne, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%