Comparison of Peristat Online Perimetry with the Humphrey Perimetry in a Clinic-Based Setting

Lowry, Eugene A.; Hou, Jing; Hennein, Lauren; Chang, Robert; Lin, Shan; Keenan, Jeremy D.; Wang, Sean K.; Ianchulev, Tsontcho; Pasquale, Louis R.; Han, Ying

doi:10.1167/tvst.5.4.4

Cited by 32 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There are online and app-based perimeters available, such as Peristat (Keep Your Sight Foundation, Los Angeles, California). [22][23][24] For evaluation of macular diseases there are apps and devices to monitor the central 10 8 including the commercially available preferential hyperacuity perimeter ForSee device (Notal Vision) and discrimination apps such as mVT (Vital Art and Science) application. 16 Smartphone retinal imaging is available, but not yet designed for patients to use at home.…”

Section: Intraocular Pressurementioning

confidence: 99%

Virtual Ophthalmology: Telemedicine in a COVID-19 Era

Saleem

Pasquale

Sidoti

et al. 2020

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Self Cite

265

247

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To discuss the effects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 betacoronavirus on ambulatory ophthalmology practices, the value proposition of telemedicine, teleophthalmology implementation methodologies, and the accelerated future of telemedicine.DESIGN: Review of the current telehealth landscape including usage, policies, and techniques for ambulatory practice integration.METHODS: We provide author-initiated review of recent trends in telehealth, governmental recommendations for health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a PubMed Central query for telemedicine in ophthalmology or teleophthalmology. In addition, the authors' comprehensive experience in telemedicine design and implementation is provided.RESULTS: We provide a summary describing the present state of telehealth, teleophthalmology modeling, care delivery, and the proposed impact of telehealth surges on the future of ophthalmology practice.CONCLUSION: Recent patient and provider interest in telemedicine, the relaxation of regulatory restrictions, increased remote care reimbursement, and ongoing social distancing practices compel many ophthalmologists to consider virtualizing services.

show abstract

Section: Intraocular Pressurementioning

confidence: 99%

Virtual Ophthalmology: Telemedicine in a COVID-19 Era

Saleem

Pasquale

Sidoti

et al. 2020

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Self Cite

265

247

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the future, remote testing using web-or tablet-based programs may be useful. 36,37 3. Intraocular pressure.…”

Section: Key Components Of Teleglaucoma Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Telemedicine for Glaucoma: Guidelines and Recommendations

Gan

Liu

Stagg

et al. 2020

Telemedicine and e-Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Access to glaucoma specialists is challenging and likely to become more difficult as the population ages. Introduction: Using telemedicine for glaucoma (teleglaucoma) has the potential to increase access to glaucoma care by improving efficiency and decreasing the need for long-distance travel for patients. Results: Teleglaucoma programs can be used for screening, diagnostic consultation, and long-term treatment monitoring. Key components of teleglaucoma programs include patient history, equipment, intraocular pressure measurement, pachymetry, anterior chamber imaging/gonioscopy, fundus photography, retinal nerve fiber layer imaging, medical record and imaging software, and skilled personnel. Discussion: Teleglaucoma has tremendous potential to improve patient access to high-quality cost-effective glaucoma care. Conclusions: We have reviewed some special considerations needed to address the complexity of providing guidelineconcordant glaucoma care.

show abstract

“…Other systems have found similar results. Peristat online perimetry had comparable ROC curves and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient ranging from 0.55 to 0.77 (all P <0.001) when compared with the Humphrey perimeter 30. VFE, which is an iPad application for visual field testing, had ROC/AUC ranging from 0.687 to 0.784 31,32…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter

Tsapakis¹,

Papaconstantinou²,

Diagourtas³

et al. 2018

OPTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTo present a home-based visual field examination method using a PC monitor or virtual reality glasses and evaluate the reliability of the method by comparing the results with those of the Humphrey perimeter, in order to assess the possibility of glaucoma screening through the Internet.Materials and methodsSoftware implementing a supra-threshold algorithm for the central 24° (52 points) of visual field at three threshold levels: 1) −4 db, 2) −8 db, and 3) −12 db, from the age-expected sensitivity was used for the purpose of testing. The software uses the web camera as a “virtual photometer” in order to detect room luminosity and allows self-testing using a computer monitor or virtual reality glasses using an Android smartphone with a 6-inch display. The software includes an expert system to analyze the visual field image and validate the reliability of the results. It also allows the physician to combine the results from two or more tests into a single test in order to achieve higher statistical accuracy of the final result. A total of ten patients, 20 eyes tested×52 points per eye=1,040 visual field test points, were compared point to point to those obtained using the Humphrey perimeter for the same patients, as they appeared randomly and consecutively at the glaucoma department within hours.ResultsGood receiver operating characteristic/area under the curve coefficient was found, ranging from 0.762 to 0.837 (P<0.001). Sensitivity ranged from 0.637 to 0.942, and specificity ranged from 0.735 to 0.497.ConclusionThe home-based visual field test exhibits a reasonable receiver operating characteristic curve when compared to the Humphrey perimeter, without the need of specialized equipment. The test may be useful for glaucoma screening.

show abstract

Comparison of Peristat Online Perimetry with the Humphrey Perimetry in a Clinic-Based Setting

Cited by 32 publications

References 28 publications

Virtual Ophthalmology: Telemedicine in a COVID-19 Era

Virtual Ophthalmology: Telemedicine in a COVID-19 Era

Telemedicine for Glaucoma: Guidelines and Recommendations

Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About