Comparison of perioperative outcome for esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that for thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position

Yatabe, Tomoaki; Fukunaga, K.; Tateiwa, Hiroki; Tamura, Takahiko; Yamashita, Koichi; Yokoyama, Masataka

doi:10.1097/00003643-201106001-00706

Cited by 9 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Six studies reported average length of hospital stay with range or standard deviation [15,16,18,20,22,23]. There was no significant difference between the groups in average length of hospital stay (WMD ¼ 0.99; 95% C.I.…”

Section: Length Of Hospital Staymentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Length Of Hospital Staymentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The mean duration of the operative time was 541 min for patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with SIT, including our case [2,5]. Meanwhile, it was reported the mean duration of the entire procedure performed in the left decubitus position was 562-576 min for those without SIT [9,10]. Therefore, the operation time showed little difference for those with SIT compared to those without SIT.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with situs inversus totalis: a case report and literature review

Ujiie

Nakano

Kamei

et al. 2016

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A 63-year-old male visited our hospital, complaining of discomfort when swallowing. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a type 2 tumor in the middle thoracic esophagus, which was diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma by endoscopic biopsy. Computed tomography revealed situs inversus totalis (SIT). We assessed the relationship of the esophagus with neighboring organs using preoperative three-dimensional imaging. We performed thoracoscopic esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection in the right decubitus position and hand-assisted laparoscopic gastric mobilization in the supine position. The definitive diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma, pT2N1M0, pStage IIB according to the Union for International Cancer Control. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and 5 years post-operation, he is alive without recurrence. In SIT patients, surgical procedures are difficult because of anatomic transposition. Three-dimensional imaging effectively assesses the anatomical structure and contributes to safer thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients with SIT. Relevant literature is also discussed and reviewed.

show abstract

“…Consequently, MIE-PP may result in less postoperative chest wall pain, reducing the need for strong analgesics after surgery, and it also decreases the risks of intercostal vessel injury and surgical site infection. These advantages could equate with lower levels of inflammatory response and earlier recovery of activity [67,68].…”

Section: Improvement In Respiratory Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparison of perioperative outcome for esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that for thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with situs inversus totalis: a case report and literature review

Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About