2003
DOI: 10.1258/000456303321610565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of perfusate activities of glutathione S-transferase, alanine aminopeptidase and fatty acid binding protein in the assessment of non-heart-beating donor kidneys

Abstract: Background With a universal shortage of donor organs, screening and selection of marginal kidneys from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) provides a valuable source for transplantation. Pre-transplant viability assessment is based on a combination of flow characteristics and assessment of ischaemic tissue injury during NHBD kidney machine perfusion by measurement of total glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity. Successful viability screening has facilitated 69 renal transplants from 60 NHBDs within our transpl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, PP of kidneys is considered to function through stabilization of the organ by supplying nutrients and oxygen during storage, by decreasing intrarenal vasospasm and by removal of waste materials while mimicking circulation and increasing vascular compliance. Numerous diagnostic procedures and perfusate modifications have been introduced for PP throughout its evolution (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Despite the abundance of literature examining these issues and novel technical methodologies, opinions regarding the ultimate efficacy of PP are mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, PP of kidneys is considered to function through stabilization of the organ by supplying nutrients and oxygen during storage, by decreasing intrarenal vasospasm and by removal of waste materials while mimicking circulation and increasing vascular compliance. Numerous diagnostic procedures and perfusate modifications have been introduced for PP throughout its evolution (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Despite the abundance of literature examining these issues and novel technical methodologies, opinions regarding the ultimate efficacy of PP are mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the predictive value of these perfusion characteristics is limited (10,11). Organ viability is also assessed by measurement of tissue injury markers in the preservation solution, such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and fatty acid binding proteins (H-FABP) (5)(6)(7)12,13). These assays are based on the release of cytoplasmic contents of ischemically injured cells into the interstitial and intravascular space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De las mayores ventajas que ofrecen es la posibilidad de registrar parámetros como la presión de perfusión, el flujo de perfusión o la medición de la concentración de determinados marcadores de lesión tisular para obtener información pronóstica de la viabilidad del órgano ex vivo. Estudios recientes hablan sobre la utilidad de la determinación de la α-glutatión-S-transferasa en el líquido de perfusión como marcador de daño celular [20][21][22] pero aún no se ha llegado a un marcador de la función renal post-trasplante realmente fiable 23 . Esto nos permitiría seleccionar para su trasplante solamente los órganos con los que previsiblemente se va a alcanzar un éxito clínico.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified