2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of performance of land use regression models derived for Catalunya, Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A different LUR model was used for the more recent (ESCAPE model) exposures than for the pregnancy and early life exposures (INMA model), which may be difficult for direct comparisons. However, for NO 2 , the ESCAPE model performed well at the ESCAPE sites in Sabadell (R 2 =0.69), and ESCAPE and INMA-Sabadell model predictions at INMA-Sabadell cohort addresses were relatively well correlated (R 2 =0.56) 34. Not all participants were able to perform spirometry testing; although preschool children are able to perform these manoeuvres 35.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A different LUR model was used for the more recent (ESCAPE model) exposures than for the pregnancy and early life exposures (INMA model), which may be difficult for direct comparisons. However, for NO 2 , the ESCAPE model performed well at the ESCAPE sites in Sabadell (R 2 =0.69), and ESCAPE and INMA-Sabadell model predictions at INMA-Sabadell cohort addresses were relatively well correlated (R 2 =0.56) 34. Not all participants were able to perform spirometry testing; although preschool children are able to perform these manoeuvres 35.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although REGICOR was aimed at capturing the small-scale variation between residential addresses of cohort members in a Mediterranean city with narrow street canyons, ESCAPE was aimed at capturing exposure to main emission sources in a standardized manner all across regions in Europe. Comparison of performance between the REGICOR and the ESCAPE LUR models has been evaluated elsewhere ( de Nazelle et al 2013 ). This study showed that models performed relatively similarly well at predicting their own measured concentrations, but the ESCAPE model increasingly overpredicted the measurements of independent data sets at higher NO 2 levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the model performance of LUR was consistent across the location settings ( Table 2). Since the LUR model construction was primarily focused on trafficrelated variables, depicting small-scale spatial variability in concentrations due to traffic, 10,16 it is no surprise that the LUR model outperformed AQFM at traffic site with a 17% reduction in the RMSE. The LUR model performed equally well at nontraffic sites (albeit less well than the AQFM at these sites), showing consistency across land use types, as would be hoped for (possibly a result of the natural area variable).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Thus, in addition to the small-scale spatial variability, there is a strong demand for a modeling framework that can cover large geographic domains. 10 Chemical Transport Models (CTM) are used to simulate the dynamics of ambient air pollutants over large spatial domains with coarse spatial resolution (between 12 and 25 km at regional scale, and between 4 and 10 km for single country applications) and fine temporal resolution (1 h) by jointly accounting for the emission patterns, meteorological conditions, and chemical reactions. 11−13 CTMs divide the atmosphere into three-dimensional grid cells.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%