2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00430-008-0102-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of performance in two diagnostic methods for tuberculosis infection

Abstract: Performance of two diagnoses, T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G), was compared in Japanese subjects. Forty-seven confirmed tuberculosis patients and eighty-four healthy subjects were recruited. All samples were assessed for both T-SPOT and QFT-G, and the sensitivities and the specificities were compared between two methods. The sensitivity was 100% for T-SPOT, and 87.2% for QFT-G. The specificity was 83.3 and 98.8%, respectively. The overall agreement of two tests was substantially high (Kappa … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded studies from analysis that either used criteria from the USA for scoring T-SPOT1.TB results [30], or that were performed in intermediate tuberculosis burden countries. In the latter, even individuals belonging to low-risk groups may have been exposed to unknown M. tuberculosis infection with a potentially higher risk of infection than that expected in low-burden countries [31][32][33]. Regarding the comparison of IGRAs with TST, one report [28] was excluded because the TST was not performed in all the enrolled subjects.…”
Section: Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded studies from analysis that either used criteria from the USA for scoring T-SPOT1.TB results [30], or that were performed in intermediate tuberculosis burden countries. In the latter, even individuals belonging to low-risk groups may have been exposed to unknown M. tuberculosis infection with a potentially higher risk of infection than that expected in low-burden countries [31][32][33]. Regarding the comparison of IGRAs with TST, one report [28] was excluded because the TST was not performed in all the enrolled subjects.…”
Section: Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In countries with a low TB incidence, the ESAT-6-induced IFN-␥ response was found to be sensitive and specific in diagnosing latent TB infection (18,31), and exposed contacts with high levels of IFN-␥ production have a greater possibility of developing active TB than those with lower IFN-␥ levels (30). However, in high-TB-incidence countries, different data were obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tokyo group identified higher sensitivity and lower specificity of T-SPOT.TB versus QFT-G in the diagnosis of LTBI in Japanese subjects [39].…”
Section: Chronic Patients Undergoing Haemodialysismentioning
confidence: 95%