2009
DOI: 10.2175/106143008x325692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Performance and Operation of Side‐By‐Side Integrated Fixed‐Film and Conventional Activated Sludge Processes at Demonstration Scale

Abstract: A full-scale demonstration of an integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFFAS) process with floating carriers has been conducted in Ontario, Canada, since August 2003. In this study, data collected on-site from July 2005 to December 2006 are analyzed and compared with the performance of a conventional activated sludge train operated in parallel. Both trains received similar loadings and maintained comparable mixed liquor concentrations; however, the IFFAS had 50% more biomass when the attached growth was cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plant has shown capabilities of N and P removal (Rutt et al 2006). In Ontario, Canada, the Lakeview Wastewater Treatment Plant has been operating as a full-scale IFAS demonstration project (Stricker et al 2009, Maas et al 2008, Ross et al 2004 since August 2003.…”
Section: Troductiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plant has shown capabilities of N and P removal (Rutt et al 2006). In Ontario, Canada, the Lakeview Wastewater Treatment Plant has been operating as a full-scale IFAS demonstration project (Stricker et al 2009, Maas et al 2008, Ross et al 2004 since August 2003.…”
Section: Troductiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated nitrification rates allow and indirect evaluation of nitrifying activity and an opportunity to evaluate the representation of nitrifying capacity than the effluent nitrogen concentrations; and percentage nitrification. However, only when the effluent ammonia concentration is greater than 1 mg/L the nitrification rates represent the actual nitrification capacity otherwise nitrification is ammonia limited (Stricker et al 2009). Nitrification rate measured as ammonia removal is intrinsically low as it does not take into account the simultaneous hydrolysis of organic-N to ammonia.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of suspended and attached growth biomass increases the carbonaceous removal in terms of the organic loading rate (OLR), measured in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD), and promotes more advanced wastewater treatment by the longer SRT (Strieker et al 2009). Furthermore, biofilm treatment processes are stable and resistant to organic and hydraulic shock loadings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced nitrogen removal was accomplished up to full-scale (Randall et al, 1996) and enhanced phosphorous removal was accomplished up to pilot-scale (Sriwiriyarat et al, 2005). Besides improving the level of treatment in the ASP, additional advantages have been reported in IFAS processes including greater process stability (Sriwiriyarat et al, 2008), reduced sludge production and reduced solids loadings on the secondary clarifiers (Stricker et al, 2009), and enhanced sludge settleability (Kim, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%