2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1122-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and calcium sulfate cement grafting versus minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach and plate fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundThe management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) remains challenging and controversial. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare percutaneous reduction, cannulated screw fixation and calcium sulfate cement (PR+CSC) grafting with minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach and plate fixation (MISTA) for treatment of DIACFs.MethodsUltimately, 80 patients with a DIACFs were randomly allocated to receive either PR+CSC (N = 42) or MISTA (N = 38). Functional ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the lateral impingement symptoms were more profound in the PR group based on the experimental results. In Feng et al (2016) 26 , the overall postoperative complication rates of the two surgical methods (percutaneous cannulated screw fixation vs calcium sulfate cement grafting and sinus tarsi approach) were 7.1% vs 28.9% and the difference was statistically significant. These results are similar to those of our study.…”
Section: Postoperative Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the lateral impingement symptoms were more profound in the PR group based on the experimental results. In Feng et al (2016) 26 , the overall postoperative complication rates of the two surgical methods (percutaneous cannulated screw fixation vs calcium sulfate cement grafting and sinus tarsi approach) were 7.1% vs 28.9% and the difference was statistically significant. These results are similar to those of our study.…”
Section: Postoperative Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, in sinus tarsi group, calcaneus width was recovered better and more accurate reduction of the joint surface was possible. 38 In conclusion, our results show that treating calcaneus fractures following MIS method using percutaneous screwing and cement injection may yield functional, clinical and radiographic results comparable to ORIF method, but the occurrence of ulcer complications and of the problems associated to shoes decreased significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, this method has certain disadvantages. Firstly, the procedure requires extensive intraoperative fluoroscopy to observe the fracture and repeatedly examine internal fixation at each step of the operation [10]. Secondly, fracture recovery and internal fixation are frequently found to be less than ideal at follow-up, because the success of the procedure depends on the surgeon's experience [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%