1996
DOI: 10.5795/jjscc.35.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of PCR-ISH and in situ PCR in cytodiagnosis specimens. A basic study on these methods and their clinical application.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the sensitivity of in situ PCR was improved by PCR being performed on tissue specimens. In previous studies we demonstrated that in situ PCR was more able to detect HPV‐DNA than ISH in cervical smears, 37 and in the cervical squamous neoplasm of the tissue specimens 8 . Hence, based on the detailed survey of the literature and the advantages of in situ PCR, our results might be close to the true rate of HPV‐DNA detection in tumor cells in cervical adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, the sensitivity of in situ PCR was improved by PCR being performed on tissue specimens. In previous studies we demonstrated that in situ PCR was more able to detect HPV‐DNA than ISH in cervical smears, 37 and in the cervical squamous neoplasm of the tissue specimens 8 . Hence, based on the detailed survey of the literature and the advantages of in situ PCR, our results might be close to the true rate of HPV‐DNA detection in tumor cells in cervical adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%