2011
DOI: 10.3923/rjmsci.2011.61.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Patient Safety and Quality of Care Indicators Between Pre and Post Accreditation Periods in King Abdulaziz University Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, another study has focused on the comparison of the safety of patients and quality care between pre-and post-accreditation. However, this study was focusing on the nursing staff from 22 hospital units in Saudi Arabia, therefore it indicated that the results of all four types of information obtained by this study showed an overall highly significant positive attitude toward the application of the process of accreditation (Al Awa et al, 2011). Likewise, research was carried out to investigate the perception of accreditation by doctors and nurses in Jordanian private hospitals, and indicated that doctors' and nurses' attitudes toward hospital accreditation standards are positive (Diab, 2011).…”
Section: Hospital Accreditation (Ha)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, another study has focused on the comparison of the safety of patients and quality care between pre-and post-accreditation. However, this study was focusing on the nursing staff from 22 hospital units in Saudi Arabia, therefore it indicated that the results of all four types of information obtained by this study showed an overall highly significant positive attitude toward the application of the process of accreditation (Al Awa et al, 2011). Likewise, research was carried out to investigate the perception of accreditation by doctors and nurses in Jordanian private hospitals, and indicated that doctors' and nurses' attitudes toward hospital accreditation standards are positive (Diab, 2011).…”
Section: Hospital Accreditation (Ha)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As seen in table 2, most of the studies reported that non-punitive response to error is the least positively ranked area irrespective of the type of the participants or the study sittings. The lowest mean score of the non-punitive response to error dimension was scored in Saudi Arabia, 18 Palestine 39 and Egypt 40 (16%, 17% and 19.5%, respectively). Studies that were conducted in primary care settings 41 42 did not show any variation in terms of positive scores on the organisational learning and continuous improvement dimension when compared with the studies carried out in hospital settings as well as on the dimension of teamwork within units.…”
Section: Strengths and Area Of Potential Improvementmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…17 More importantly, it was reported that accreditation programmes have helped in improving the perception on the quality of patient care and patient safety in Saudi hospitals. 18 Furthermore, a study was performed in hospitals in Egypt, Jordan, Kenya, Morocco, South Africa, Sudan, Tunisia and Yemen to assess the frequency and nature of adverse events to patients of these countries. The study found that of the 15 548 records that were reviewed, 8.2% showed at least 1 adverse event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La educación especializada puede informar los criterios de calidad y, consecuentemente, el personal estará mejor capacitado para implementar nuevas estrategias de calidad en el cuidado de la salud, como la acreditación. En los servicios más calificados, los enfermeros pueden desarrollar programas innovadores centrados en nuevos conceptos de estructura, con el objetivo de lograr una mejor calidad a través de las mejores prácticas en el cuidado de la salud (15,16) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified