2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of patient dose from routine multi-phase and dynamic liver perfusion CT studies taking into account the effect of iodinated contrast administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most studies of routine CTA scanning of the aorta in patients with suspected interlining, the images are acquired 20-25 s after contrast medium injection; often for arterial hemodynamic changes, single-phase data may show little deviation or, because the blood ow velocity is slow, appear such as near the heart where imaging quality is higher, but the far heart end may have poor image quality [21][22][23]. In order to solve these problems, multiphase data can be acquired by dynamic scanning imaging within a range of 15-35 s to supplement the information missing in single-phase scanning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies of routine CTA scanning of the aorta in patients with suspected interlining, the images are acquired 20-25 s after contrast medium injection; often for arterial hemodynamic changes, single-phase data may show little deviation or, because the blood ow velocity is slow, appear such as near the heart where imaging quality is higher, but the far heart end may have poor image quality [21][22][23]. In order to solve these problems, multiphase data can be acquired by dynamic scanning imaging within a range of 15-35 s to supplement the information missing in single-phase scanning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim in this work is to correlate between dose and image quality metrics in pediatric while implementing CT optimization protocols. Among radiation dose metrics, organ equivalent dose is considered one of the best indicators for characterizing patient radiation burden [10,32]. Several researchers have been inspired to reduce the risk by altering the variable of scan parameters, including growing the pitch factor, increasing slice collimation, choosing tube voltage, and utilizing automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) feature [33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, with growing involvement in radiation-induced cancer, this debate is again in the spotlight, as radiation exposure optimization is a particular problem in pediatric patients receiving repeated CT examination [6][7][8]. Despite the high frequency of CT procedure usage amongst children, radiation burden from CT examination needs to be considered as children are more sensitive to radiation as compared to adults [9,10]. Since 2007, the American College of Radiology (ACR), the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR), the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), and the American Society of Radiology Technologists (ASRT) have engaged in the Image Gently campaign in the United States to grow the knowledge of practice by increasing awareness among radiation personnel [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CT may be cost-effective for HCC screening [ 10 ], it is considered to be unfavorable for surveillance purposes because of repetitive and thus cumulative radiation exposure. As imaging for HCC requires at least three phases, i.e., arterial, portal-venous, and delayed phases after intravenous contrast administration, the radiation dose is estimated to be around 20 mSv per examination [ 11 ]. Although, a recent meta-analysis found that a cumulative dose of 100 mSv and probably 200 mSv may not increase the risk of carcinogenesis for patients; this cumulative dose is reached within 5 years in the case of HCC surveillance [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%