Comparison of patient and physician perspectives in the management of rheumatoid arthritis: results from global physician- and patient-based surveys

Abstract

BackgroundIn order to better understand the perspectives of patients and physicians regarding the treatment and management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), we present and compare results from a patient-based and a physician-based survey developed by the RA NarRAtive advisory panel.MethodsThe RA NarRAtive initiative is directed by a global advisory panel of 39 healthcare providers and patient organization leaders from 17 countries. A survey of patients self-reporting a diagnosis of RA and a physician-based survey, designed by the advisory panel, were fielded online by Harris Poll from September 2014 to April 2016, and from August 2015 to October 2015, respectively.ResultsWe present findings from 1805 patients whose RA was primarily managed by a rheumatologist, and 1736 physicians managing patients with RA. Results confirmed that RA carries a substantial disease burden; half of the patients surveyed reported stopping participation in certain activities as a result of their disease. While 90% of physicians were satisfied with their communications with their patients regarding RA treatment, 61% of patients felt uncomfortable raising concerns or fears with their physician. Of the patients providing responses, 52% felt that improved dialogue/discussion would optimize their RA management, and 68% of physicians wished that they and their patients talked more about their RA goals and treatment. Overall, 88% of physicians agreed that patients involved in making treatment decisions tend to be more satisfied with their treatment experience.ConclusionThe results of these surveys highlight the impact of RA on patients, and a discrepancy between patient and physician views on communication. Further research, focused on improving patient–physician dialogue, shared goal-setting, and treatment planning, is needed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-1035-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Google search data as a novel adjunct to patient and public involvement in rheumatology research

“…This highlights the need for clinicians to facilitate conversations regarding work and disability during clinic appointments, and the importance of the multi-disciplinary team, including psychologists and occupational therapists, and patient support services. Patient and public involvement, in rheumatology and elsewhere, has repeatedly highlighted the value placed on their relationship with health professionals, including ease of communication and approachability [8,17]. Consistent with this, some common Google searches included "rheumatoid arthritis doctors near me" and "rheumatoid arthritis support group near me".…”

Elevating the role of carers in rheumatoid arthritis management in the Asia‐Pacific region

“…No ethics approval was required as this was a quality assurance activity, which is in line with the standards and guidelines for ethics review in all 3 countries [11][12][13] as well as with the practice of similar studies published recently in the area of carers in rheumatology. [14][15][16][17] Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in both the qualitative and quantitative studies.…”

How Appropriate Are Appropriate-use Criteria?

“…No patients were included, so factors of importance to patients were not given the same weight as those ranked by surgeons, even among the variables selected by literature review, and it is known that priorities can differ. The balance of benefit to harm that defines appropriateness should include the patients' perspective 12,13 .…”