2013
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429x-15-s1-e74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of parameters for left ventricular volumes and function between echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a large group of cardiac patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this setting, the Teichholz calculation performs well 14 —a recent study showed closer values than biplane ejection fraction assessed using the gold standard of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. 15 Visual assessment, despite its semiqualitative nature, is also accurate when undertaken by experienced practitioners. 16 17 Abnormal systolic function leads to a formal biplane volumetric assessment of ejection fraction, classified as follows: normal ≥60%, mildly impaired 45–59%, moderately impaired 35–44% and severely impaired <35%.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this setting, the Teichholz calculation performs well 14 —a recent study showed closer values than biplane ejection fraction assessed using the gold standard of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. 15 Visual assessment, despite its semiqualitative nature, is also accurate when undertaken by experienced practitioners. 16 17 Abnormal systolic function leads to a formal biplane volumetric assessment of ejection fraction, classified as follows: normal ≥60%, mildly impaired 45–59%, moderately impaired 35–44% and severely impaired <35%.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has cemented CMR at the center of diagnostic imaging in Europe, proving that it is feasible and safe with 62% of the scans performed having an impact on patient management, the most common indication being for risk stratification in coronary artery disease. Florian Andre presented data from a cohort of more than a 1000 patients showing that measuring left ventricular ejection fraction by CMR reclassified many patients into different risk groups when compared to echocardiography [37]. Others have shown the potential clinical impact of more accurate measurement of ejection fraction by CMR on selecting patients who might benefit from defibrillator implantation [38].…”
Section: Implementation Of Cmr Into Routine Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the assessment of cardiac function, the current non-invasive gold standard is cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) (Andre et al 2013). However, its expense, the requirement for trained personal and its lack of portability make it unsuitable for primary, home care and ambulatory scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%