2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cccb.2021.100021
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Oxford Cognitive Screen and Montreal Cognitive Assessment feasibility in the stroke unit setting. A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of this study are aware of only three independent evaluations. Firstly, Brambilla et al (2021) reported that only 62% of OCS assessments were completed in their entirety, with stroke patients being unable to complete the executive task 36% of the time. Of note, previous research has established that approximately 25% of stroke patients are deemed either ‘untestable’ or ‘partially untestable’ (Elliott et al, 2019), so this issue is certainly not unique to the OCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of this study are aware of only three independent evaluations. Firstly, Brambilla et al (2021) reported that only 62% of OCS assessments were completed in their entirety, with stroke patients being unable to complete the executive task 36% of the time. Of note, previous research has established that approximately 25% of stroke patients are deemed either ‘untestable’ or ‘partially untestable’ (Elliott et al, 2019), so this issue is certainly not unique to the OCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%