2023
DOI: 10.1159/000534458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Outcomes between a Basket Catheter and a Balloon Catheter for Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Removal

Hirokazu Saito,
Hajime Iwasaki,
Hisashi Itoshima
et al.

Abstract: BIntroduction: Evidence for the outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) between a basket catheter and a balloon catheter for endoscopic common bile duct stone (CBDS) removal is lacking. This study aimed to compare ERCP outcomes using a basket catheter and a balloon catheter for endoscopic CBDS removal. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 904 consecutive patients with native papilla who underwent endoscopic stone removal for CBDS ≤10 mm using a basket catheter and/or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both extraction devices are considered equally effective according to ESGE guidelines [3]. However, in a recent multicenter retrospective study with 904 patients who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis, balloon catheters exhibited significantly higher success rates for stone extraction during the first ERCP session when compared to basket catheters (81.3% vs. 17.8%; p < 0.001) [41]. Still, this study included only patients with small CBD stones ≤10 mm and its results should be re-evaluated in cases with difficult bile duct stones.…”
Section: Extraction Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both extraction devices are considered equally effective according to ESGE guidelines [3]. However, in a recent multicenter retrospective study with 904 patients who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis, balloon catheters exhibited significantly higher success rates for stone extraction during the first ERCP session when compared to basket catheters (81.3% vs. 17.8%; p < 0.001) [41]. Still, this study included only patients with small CBD stones ≤10 mm and its results should be re-evaluated in cases with difficult bile duct stones.…”
Section: Extraction Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%