1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02236902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of oral with rectal mesalazine in the treatment of ulcerative proctitis

Abstract: Results of this study indicate that treatment with mesalazine suppositories produces earlier and significantly better results than oral mesalazine in the treatment of active ulcerative proctitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
93
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In a 4-week randomized, single-blinded study comparing pH-dependent oral mesalazine 2.4 g/day (800 mg tablet taken three times per day) with rectal mesalazine suppository 2.4 g/day (400 mg suppository administered 3 times per day), clinical, endoscopical, and histological remission rates were significantly higher with mesalazine suppository than with oral mesalazine [20]. Mesalazine suppository 1 g at bedtime and 500 mg twice daily were equally effective for patients with ulcerative proctitis [21].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 4-week randomized, single-blinded study comparing pH-dependent oral mesalazine 2.4 g/day (800 mg tablet taken three times per day) with rectal mesalazine suppository 2.4 g/day (400 mg suppository administered 3 times per day), clinical, endoscopical, and histological remission rates were significantly higher with mesalazine suppository than with oral mesalazine [20]. Mesalazine suppository 1 g at bedtime and 500 mg twice daily were equally effective for patients with ulcerative proctitis [21].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 4-week, randomized, single-blind trial in UP patients showed that mesalazine suppositories were more effective than oral mesalazine both in decreasing disease activity and in increasing the rate of histologic remission, at 2-and 4-week follow-up [16]. On the other hand, Kam et al [17] described a similar clinical efficacy of oral versus rectal mesalazine in the same clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In fact, scintigraphic studies have demonstrated that the drug is consistently delivered to the rectum and distal sigmoid colon [2,3], and that suppositories are as effective as enemas but are better tolerated and preferred by patients [4]. Recently, 5-ASA suppositories (400 mg t.i.d) have been shown to produce earlier and significantly better results than oral mesalazine (2.4 g daily) in the treatment of active proctitis [5].…”
Section: Management Of Mild-to-moderate Ulcerative Colitismentioning
confidence: 99%