2004
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Oral Psoralen–UV-A With a Portable Tanning Unit at Home vs Hospital-Administered Bath Psoralen–UV-A in Patients With Chronic Hand Eczema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The high drop‐out rate of 21% may be considered a potential source of bias. There was, however, no difference between the drop‐outs and the remaining participants with regard to physician‐rated severity score at T1 or change between T1 and T2 1 . Furthermore, the physician‐rated severity score was calculated by taking the mean score of the right and the left hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high drop‐out rate of 21% may be considered a potential source of bias. There was, however, no difference between the drop‐outs and the remaining participants with regard to physician‐rated severity score at T1 or change between T1 and T2 1 . Furthermore, the physician‐rated severity score was calculated by taking the mean score of the right and the left hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with NB‐UVB, which has been shown to be more effective than PUVA, complete clearance is seen in only 50% of patients with generalized eczema . For CHFE, PUVA therapy has not been shown to have long‐term effectiveness with multiple studies showing no difference between either NB‐UVB or PUVA in CHFE treatment …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients find it problematic to schedule regular visits within normal working hours and to travel to the facilities. PUVA with portable home-UVA devices [66] and phototherapy with portable UVB devices [67] have been described, but are not recommended as a general practice due to concerns that uncontrolled use may be associated with an increased risk of carcinogenicity [58].…”
Section: Uv Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%