2016
DOI: 10.1111/pan.13010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of oral midazolam with intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication for children undergoing CT imaging: a randomized, double‐blind, and controlled study

Abstract: In the doses and time intervals used in our study, intranasal dexmedetomidine (2.5 μg·kg ) was found to be superior to oral midazolam (0.5 mg·kg ) for producing satisfactory sedation for CT imaging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
51
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous published studies found no adverse respiratory events associated with the use of intranasal dexmedetomidine and/or ketamine . Rate of respiratory events observed in this study is similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Numerous published studies found no adverse respiratory events associated with the use of intranasal dexmedetomidine and/or ketamine . Rate of respiratory events observed in this study is similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Dexmedetomidine is useful as a sedative/hypnotic, and offers the advantage of having both sedative and anxiolytic effects, as well as relatively mild analgesic properties and a relatively short elimination half‐life of 2 h . Dexmedetomidine has been useful by the intranasal route, but has some drawbacks in terms of effectiveness, onset and offset time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significant clinical advantages of dexmedetomidine due to its sedative properties paralleling natural sleep, with minimal respiratory depression . Compared to traditional sedative such as midazolam, chloral hydrate, and propofol, patients treated with dexmedetomidine have fewer side effects and better arousability. When used as premedication by a noninvasive way, intranasal dexmedetomidine has been shown to confer an advantage over both buccal dexmedetomidine (1 μg kg −1 ) and oral midazolam (0.5 mg kg −1 ) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deksmedetomidin har analgetikum-og anestetikumsparende effekt, påvirker i minimal grad respirasjonen og kan administreres via ulike ruter (1)(2)(3). Intranasal rute er lite traumatisk, og deksmedetomidin er smakløst, luktfritt og smertefritt ved bruk i neseslimhinnen, noe som gjør at medikamentet tolereres godt av barn (4,5).…”
unclassified