WCNC. 1999 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (Cat. No.99TH8466)
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.1999.797863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of optimum and sub-optimum turbo decoding schemes in 3rd generation cdma2000 mobile system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to have a robust design for all channel situations and to transform this signal with wide dynamic range to a finite precision data, the output of the RAKE receiver must be scaled. Different studies have been conducted on fixed point realization, signal quantization and scaling and numerical issues of turbo codes [5][6][7][8]. In this section, we compare performance and complexity of different scaling schemes for the 3GPP system.…”
Section: Signal Scaling and Quantizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to have a robust design for all channel situations and to transform this signal with wide dynamic range to a finite precision data, the output of the RAKE receiver must be scaled. Different studies have been conducted on fixed point realization, signal quantization and scaling and numerical issues of turbo codes [5][6][7][8]. In this section, we compare performance and complexity of different scaling schemes for the 3GPP system.…”
Section: Signal Scaling and Quantizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 3GPP, the entire transport block is used to calculate the CRC parity bits for each transport block. The parity bits are generated by the following cyclic generator polynomials: g CRC16 (D) = D 16 + D 12 + D 5 + 1 (8) and the encoding is performed in a systematic form, which means that in GF(2), the polynomial:…”
Section: Crc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to Max-Log-MAP, SOVA also deals with only two paths: one is the ML path, but the other is not necessarily the same as that considered in Max-Log-MAP, the best competing path. Thus, SOVA will lose approximately another 0.5 dB in performance compared with Max-Log-MAP, but with a much lower complexity [17]. Again, it is shown in [12] that some modifications can be made on SOVA to make it equivalent to Max-Log-MAP.…”
Section: Turbo Decoding For Coded Dmt Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%