8th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2016) 2016
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2016.0331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Optimized Pulse Patterns with Direct Model Predictive Control Using Co-Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, there is actually a thermal sweet spot at which the total motor losses are minimal [134] [135]. One might want to control the motor temperature to this sweet spot, e.g., by manipulating the active motor cooling or by changing inverter pulse patterns to pursue certain loss distributions within the motor [136]. In this respect, temperature monitoring is a central task of the drive control software.…”
Section: Derating Safety Margins and Estimation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there is actually a thermal sweet spot at which the total motor losses are minimal [134] [135]. One might want to control the motor temperature to this sweet spot, e.g., by manipulating the active motor cooling or by changing inverter pulse patterns to pursue certain loss distributions within the motor [136]. In this respect, temperature monitoring is a central task of the drive control software.…”
Section: Derating Safety Margins and Estimation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, predictive model-based control (PMC) has been suggested as robust control strategy by [17][18][19] to regulate the AC voltage constant and mitigate harmonics at the PCC. This concept based on prediction current and voltage control techniques for VSI connected to LRC filter is also suggested in [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%