2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.385-386.1443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Optical and Concentration Feature Used for fNIRS-Based BCI System Using HMM

Abstract: Abstract. Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is very useful for people who lose limb control such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, stroke patients and patients with prosthetic limbs. Among all the brain signal acquisition devices, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an efficient approach to detect hemodynamic responses correlated with brain activities using optical method, and its spatial resolution is much higher than EEG. In this paper, we investigate the classification performance o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many fNIRS BCI studies to date (e.g., Holper and Wolf, 2011 ; Fazli et al, 2012 ; Xu et al, 2014 ) employ subject-dependent BCIs, i.e., trained on data from the subject in question, either from parts of the test session itself or from separate sessions of the same subject. The latter scenario avoids some issues in how preprocessing (e.g., whole-data statistics), trial selection (e.g., randomized cross-validation), or reduced cap fit variability within-session might lead to overestimating BCI performance relative to a full session-to-session transfer setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many fNIRS BCI studies to date (e.g., Holper and Wolf, 2011 ; Fazli et al, 2012 ; Xu et al, 2014 ) employ subject-dependent BCIs, i.e., trained on data from the subject in question, either from parts of the test session itself or from separate sessions of the same subject. The latter scenario avoids some issues in how preprocessing (e.g., whole-data statistics), trial selection (e.g., randomized cross-validation), or reduced cap fit variability within-session might lead to overestimating BCI performance relative to a full session-to-session transfer setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly in motor execution paradigms, the majority of studies also utilize 10 to 20 s (or longer) trials, with few exceptions including Huppert et al (2006) and Gagnon et al (2012Gagnon et al ( , 2014 (2, 2, and 5 s, respectively). Finger tapping, as studied here, is one of the most common types of hand motor studies in the literature (e.g., Sitaram et al, 2007;Holper and Wolf, 2011;Wu et al, 2018;Bak et al, 2019;Kwon et al, 2020), although we note that alternatives such as fist clenching, e.g., studied by Xu et al (2014) or squeezing a ball or soft prop (e.g., Coyle et al, 2007;Batula et al, 2017) have also been used.…”
Section: Short-duration Hand Motor Imagery Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The received symbol can be observed, but the state in which an error happens is not observable. HMMs were used for modeling the statistics of burst errors in the communication channel [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] . The advantage of HMM compared to the standard wireless channel simulation is its high advance in simulation time.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor imagery (MI) is defined as the cognitive activity in which a subject imagines a movement without actually performing the movement (Vries and Mulder, 2007), and it is a common application paradigm in the field of braincomputer interface research (Mattia et al, 2012). This method realizes communication and control with external devices by imaging body movements (Xu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%