2012
DOI: 10.5194/amt-5-1611-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of OH concentration measurements by DOAS and LIF during SAPHIR chamber experiments at high OH reactivity and low NO concentration

Abstract: Abstract. During recent field campaigns, hydroxyl radical (OH) concentrations that were measured by laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) were up to a factor of ten larger than predicted by current chemical models for conditions of high OH reactivity and low NO concentration. These discrepancies, which were observed in forests and urban-influenced rural environments, are so far not entirely understood. In summer 2011, a series of experiments was carried out in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR in Jülich, Ger… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using OH LIF or DOAS measurements made no difference in the OH budget analysis which is consistent with previous experiments in SAPHIR where excellent agreement of the two OH detection techniques was demonstrated under various experimental conditions (Schlosser et al, , 2009Fuchs et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using OH LIF or DOAS measurements made no difference in the OH budget analysis which is consistent with previous experiments in SAPHIR where excellent agreement of the two OH detection techniques was demonstrated under various experimental conditions (Schlosser et al, , 2009Fuchs et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Measurements of trace gas concentrations include volatile organic compounds (proton transfer reaction time of flight mass spectrometry, PTR-TOF-MS), HCHO (Hantzsch reaction), HONO (long path absorption photometry, LOPAP), CO (reduction gas analysis, RGA), CO 2 , CH 4 , H 2 O (cavity ring-down spectroscopy, CRDS), as well as NO, NO 2 and O 3 (chemiluminescence, CL). The reader is referred to previous publications for detailed information on the analytical instrumentation of SAPHIR Fuchs et al, 2010Fuchs et al, , 2012Dorn et al, 2013;Fuchs et al, 2013, and references therein). Table 1 provides an overview of the key instruments for this study and their performances.…”
Section: Analytical Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAPHIR can be regarded as a large chemical reactor that provides a homogeneous mixture of trace gases in synthetic air, ensuring that instruments sampled the same air mass. It has been shown in several comparison exercises that this assumption is justified for OH (Schlosser et al, 2007(Schlosser et al, , 2009Fuchs et al, 2012). Details of the chamber can be also found in these publications.…”
Section: Experiments In the Simulation Chamber Saphirmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Details of the instruments that were deployed in previous field and chamber experiments are described in Holland et al (2003); Fuchs et al (2008bFuchs et al ( , 2012; Lu et al (2012). Here, we used the instrument that is permanently installed at the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR .…”
Section: Ro X Detection By Laser-induced Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty of the OH measurement, determined by the accuracy of the calibration of the LIF instrument, is 10 % (1σ ). The LIF instrument is described in detail by Fuchs et al (2012). The OH radicals in these experiments are predominantly formed from the ozonolysis of the VOCs, and to a minor extent by HONO and ozone photolysis .…”
Section: Analytical Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%