2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of numerical approaches for structural response analysis of passenger ships in collisions and groundings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the method special attention has been attributed to breach validation by comparisons against LS-DYNA. A benchmark study accounting for different scenarios of collision between the NAPA D-RoPax passenger ship and Floodstand Ship B cruise ship demonstrated good agreement between different methods developed by different project partners irrespective to modelling simplifications [4]. For both collision and grounding cases comparisons showed good correlation.…”
Section: Damage Breach Modelling Beyond Current Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To validate the method special attention has been attributed to breach validation by comparisons against LS-DYNA. A benchmark study accounting for different scenarios of collision between the NAPA D-RoPax passenger ship and Floodstand Ship B cruise ship demonstrated good agreement between different methods developed by different project partners irrespective to modelling simplifications [4]. For both collision and grounding cases comparisons showed good correlation.…”
Section: Damage Breach Modelling Beyond Current Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These two principal features are considered in the software SHARP, which allows for performing fast collision simulations. The accuracy of this method was recently reconfirmed during Project FLARE, by benchmarking against Finite Element codes ( Kim et al, 2022). Furthermore, the methodology allows for building damage databases suitable not only for the generation of damages in the design stage (Conti et al, 2022) but also for the estimation of risk in real-time applications (Mauro et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Breach Generationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Naturally, in normal conditions the open WTDs can be closed rapidly, but in practice this may not always be possible, e.g. due to structural deformation caused by a collision or grounding [67][68][69][70].…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%