Comparison of Nonmydriatic Digital Retinal Imaging versus Dilated Ophthalmic Examination for Nondiabetic Eye Disease in Persons with Diabetes

Chow, Sing-Pey; Aiello, Lloyd M.; Cavallerano, Jerry D.; Katalinic, Paula; Hock, Kristen; Tolson, Ann; Kirby, Rita; Bursell, Sven–Erik

doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.025

Cited by 59 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We found fair agreement between the results of the fundus photographs and the ophthalmologist examination (κ = 0.48), as in other studies [10,32]. The rate of unreadable photographs (13.3%) was similar to that found by Cavallerano et al [33 ](13%) and higher than for Gomez-Ulla et al [34] (5%).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Effectiveness of a Mobile Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Campaign to Encourage Diabetics to Undergo Regular Ophthalmic Follow-Up

Creuzot‐Garcher

Martin-Phipps²,

Beynat³

et al. 2014

Ophthalmic Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening campaign with a non-mydriatic camera to encourage diabetics to undergo a subsequent ophthalmic follow-up. Methods: Diabetic patients who underwent free DR screening with a non-mydriatic fundus camera were given the recommendation to have an ophthalmic visit, in a time frame suited to the DR stage or in case abnormalities in the macula, the optic nerve or intra-ocular pressure were detected. The photographs were performed by a trained orthoptist. The date of the visit to their ophthalmologist and the report of this consultation were recorded. Results: During 5 annual campaigns, 4,699 diabetics were screened. Of the 1,573 ophthalmic examinations recommended at the screening, 1,241 (79%) were actually conducted. A total of 623 new cases of DR were found in the course of this screening campaign, with a fair concordance between the diagnosis suggested at screening and the examination by the ophthalmologist (κ = 0.48). Conclusion: Information and recommendations given during DR screening helped to reintroduce patients to a regular ophthalmic follow-up, at least in the short term.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Effectiveness of a Mobile Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Campaign to Encourage Diabetics to Undergo Regular Ophthalmic Follow-Up

Creuzot‐Garcher

Martin-Phipps²,

Beynat³

et al. 2014

Ophthalmic Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This technique was unsuitable for widespread screening as it was labor intensive and not cost-effective. Other studies have tested and modified screening protocols using nonmydriatic imaging, single-field imaging and automated detection systems with variable results [3,4,20,21,22]. A recent study using wide-field imaging and OCT showed improvements in the detection rates of higher grades of diabetic retinopathy compared to clinical examination [23].…”

Section: Clinical Applications Of Multicolor Imagingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Application of Multicolor Imaging Technology

Tan¹,

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To assess the clinical application of multicolor imaging by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO). Methods: Retinal imaging was performed in 76 patients including cSLO multicolor imaging (SPECTRALIS SD-OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and color fundus photography (CFP). Results: The use of confocal optics, reduced light scatter and automated eye tracking enable high-resolution cSLO reflectance images. Compared to CFP, the appearance of pigment alterations and hemorrhages were some of the differences observed. Various artifacts including those derived from optical media alterations need to be considered when interpreting images. Specific pathological findings including epiretinal membranes, fibrovascular proliferations, and reticular pseudodrusen may be better visualized on multicolor images. Conclusions: When using multicolor imaging, ophthalmologists need to be mindful about differences in the appearance of pathological changes and artifacts. Multicolor imaging may offer information over and above conventional CFP; it can be performed through undilated pupils and is less affected by media opacities.

show abstract

“…The Joslin Vision Network Study (52 patients) suggested recent improvement, with only 3% ungradeable for DME 370 . A new technique employing stereoscopic non-mydriatic photography was reported to provide excellent agreement with a dilated ophthalmic retinal examination in a large sample (280 patients) 371 .…”

Section: Non-mydriatic (Undilated) Photographymentioning

confidence: 99%

A game changer for eye care for diabetes

Taylor

2017

Medical Journal of Australia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of Nonmydriatic Digital Retinal Imaging versus Dilated Ophthalmic Examination for Nondiabetic Eye Disease in Persons with Diabetes

Cited by 59 publications

References 15 publications

Effectiveness of a Mobile Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Campaign to Encourage Diabetics to Undergo Regular Ophthalmic Follow-Up

Effectiveness of a Mobile Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Campaign to Encourage Diabetics to Undergo Regular Ophthalmic Follow-Up

Clinical Application of Multicolor Imaging Technology

A game changer for eye care for diabetes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About