2021
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of non-myeloablative lymphodepleting preconditioning regimens in patients undergoing adoptive T cell therapy

Abstract: BackgroundAdoptive cell therapy with T cells genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) or tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TIL) demonstrates impressive clinical results in patients with cancer. Lymphodepleting preconditioning prior to cell infusion is an integral part of all adoptive T cell therapies. However, to date, there is no standardization and no data comparing different non-myeloablative (NMA) regimens.MethodsIn this study, we compared NMA therapies with different doses of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no obvious effect in a randomized trial [ 68 ]. Recently, a study summarized different NMA regimens, and suggested that the regimen of Cy (30 mg/kg for two days) and Flu (25 mg/m 2 for five days) is a better choice [ 69 ], which has maximum effect on lymphodepletion with minimum toxicity compared to other doses and regimens. Notably, most patients have experienced adverse effects caused by the NMA lymphodepletion regimen, such as neutropenia, lymphopenia, and coagulopathy, which are hematological side effects [ 5 , 70 ].…”
Section: Role Of Lymphodepletionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there was no obvious effect in a randomized trial [ 68 ]. Recently, a study summarized different NMA regimens, and suggested that the regimen of Cy (30 mg/kg for two days) and Flu (25 mg/m 2 for five days) is a better choice [ 69 ], which has maximum effect on lymphodepletion with minimum toxicity compared to other doses and regimens. Notably, most patients have experienced adverse effects caused by the NMA lymphodepletion regimen, such as neutropenia, lymphopenia, and coagulopathy, which are hematological side effects [ 5 , 70 ].…”
Section: Role Of Lymphodepletionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, most patients have experienced adverse effects caused by the NMA lymphodepletion regimen, such as neutropenia, lymphopenia, and coagulopathy, which are hematological side effects [ 5 , 70 ]. Non-hematological events include nausea, headaches, loss of appetite, neutropenic fever, diarrhea, and hyperbilirubinemia [ 5 , 69 ], which are mostly manageable by standard supportive treatment. Interestingly, in order to avoid the severe toxicity of the NMA lymphodepletion regimen, Santos et al designed a regimen which used oncolytic adenoviruses to replace NMA lymphodepleting which resulted in great efficacy [ 71 ].…”
Section: Role Of Lymphodepletionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with both above-mentioned studies, Hirayama et al [ 40 ] recently showed that a favorable cytokine profile induced by lymphodepletion is associated with better clinical outcomes and tend to be obtained by higher dose lymphodepletion. On the other hand, there is no apparent difference in clinical activity between different regimens of low to moderate intensity [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adoption of this LD regimen in CAR-T cell therapy demonstrated that higher dose cyclo/fludara use was also associated with improved efficacy [38][39][40] but an increased toxicity burden in both haematological and solid tumours [12]. Consequently, a range of lower cyclo/ fludara doses have been studied as LD in ACT therapy in solid tumours [12,[49][50][51]. For this review, we considered the original standard LD regimens containing total doses of cyclo ≥ 120 mg/kg and fludara ≥ 100 mg/m 2 as ''high dose''.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%