2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of neutron activation analysis (NAA) and energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry for the non-destructive analysis of coins minted under the early Piast dynasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, since we do not have such reference materials at our disposal, it was not possible to apply this method. Moreover, Bolewski et al (2020) showed that this ratio was not always good at predicting surface enrichment of silver. Micro-XRF has a sampling depth which is higher than the corrosion layer of typically up to 50 μm in Ag-Cu coins (Bolewski et al 2020).…”
Section: Limitations Of Surface Analysis a Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, since we do not have such reference materials at our disposal, it was not possible to apply this method. Moreover, Bolewski et al (2020) showed that this ratio was not always good at predicting surface enrichment of silver. Micro-XRF has a sampling depth which is higher than the corrosion layer of typically up to 50 μm in Ag-Cu coins (Bolewski et al 2020).…”
Section: Limitations Of Surface Analysis a Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Bolewski et al (2020) showed that this ratio was not always good at predicting surface enrichment of silver. Micro-XRF has a sampling depth which is higher than the corrosion layer of typically up to 50 μm in Ag-Cu coins (Bolewski et al 2020). The measured signal is thus a mixture of the corrosion layer and the deeper, sound metal, which usually leads to reasonable quantification (del Hoyo-Meléndez et al 2015).…”
Section: Limitations Of Surface Analysis a Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the field of cultural heritage analyses, the analytical techniques applied in each study must be selected as a function of the sample nature, as well as the destructive or nondestructive character of the equipment. The most commonly used techniques in the study of the samples from cultural heritage are: scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS) [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], X-ray fluorescence [13,16,17,20], Xray diffraction (XRD) [11][12][13]19], Raman spectroscopy [11-13, 16, 21-23], Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) [10-12, 14-16, 18, 19], X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [24,25], Auger electron spectroscopy [17,25], neutron diffraction [20,26], neutron tomography [13,27], neutron activation analysis (NAA) [20,26], and optical microscopy (OM) [12,13], as nondestructive or minimally invasive techniques. In this study, a combination of few techniques (i.e., OM, SEM-EDS, ATR-FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy) was applied to provide comprehensive information about the studied fragments.…”
Section: Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, in [12] neutron activation analysis (NAA) and XRF were compared for non-destructive analysis of antique coins from Ag-Cu alloys. The simultaneous determination of Ag and Au nanoparticles in water samples by total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry is presented in [13].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%