2021
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of neutralizing antibody responses against SARS‐CoV‐2 in healthy volunteers who received the BNT162b2 mRNA or the AZD1222 vaccine: Should the second AZD1222 vaccine dose be given earlier?

Abstract: Vaccination programs against SARS-CoV-2 are in full progress across the globe. The BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer) and the AZD1222CORRESPONDENCE E321 CORRESPONDENCE E323

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also suggest that a second timely vaccine dose is necessary for patients with hematological malignancies that deregulate the immune homeostasis, and especially for the elderly [21]. A shorter time interval between the two doses of the AZD1222 would be relevant, as well [22]. Similarly, patients with solid cancer present a suboptimal humoral response following the first dose of the BNT162b2 and they should receive an early second dose (21 days after the first shot) [23][24][25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Our results also suggest that a second timely vaccine dose is necessary for patients with hematological malignancies that deregulate the immune homeostasis, and especially for the elderly [21]. A shorter time interval between the two doses of the AZD1222 would be relevant, as well [22]. Similarly, patients with solid cancer present a suboptimal humoral response following the first dose of the BNT162b2 and they should receive an early second dose (21 days after the first shot) [23][24][25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Several reports have suggested higher immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 than BNT162b vaccine [and lower immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S than BNT162b vaccine (51)] among healthy subjects (52)(53)(54). A possible explanation is the higher dose of mRNA in the mRNA-1273 (100 mg) than in the BNT162b (30 mg) vaccine.…”
Section: Immune Response To Sars-cov-2 Mrna Vaccination In Healthy Ad...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum was separated within 4 h from blood collection and stored at −80 • C until the day of measurement. NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 were measured using an FDA-approved methodology (ELISA, cPass™ SARS-CoV-2 NAbs Detection Kit; GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) [49] on the abovementioned timepoints, as previously described [33,50]. An NAb titer of at least 30% is considered positive, whereas an NAb titer of at least 50% has been associated with clinically relevant viral inhibition [45,[51][52][53].…”
Section: Nabs Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%