1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf01413827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of neural networks and statistical models to predict gestational age at birth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model reported by Misra et al [3] , which included biomedical and psychosocial factors but not serum biomarkers, did not find maternal education to be a predictor of PTB. Two additional studies that used maternal characteristics but not biomarkers in their models calculated areas under the ROC curve of 0.70-0.73 [23,24] . The multivariate model reported by Smith et al [17] , which took into account two biomarkers ( ␣ -fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin) and maternal sociodemographic characteristics (but not specifically maternal education) yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.62 for prediction of delivery at 33-36 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model reported by Misra et al [3] , which included biomedical and psychosocial factors but not serum biomarkers, did not find maternal education to be a predictor of PTB. Two additional studies that used maternal characteristics but not biomarkers in their models calculated areas under the ROC curve of 0.70-0.73 [23,24] . The multivariate model reported by Smith et al [17] , which took into account two biomarkers ( ␣ -fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin) and maternal sociodemographic characteristics (but not specifically maternal education) yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.62 for prediction of delivery at 33-36 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%