1973
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/50.5.1243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Neoplasms in Six Sources of Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From lifetime studies, the incidence of spontaneous mammary tumors of Sprague-Dawley rats often approaches 50% in control animals, 17 and it usually varies 7-40% in studies from different sources. 18 This indicates that there is likely to be significant genetic variation over time, though dietary, hormonal and physiologic factors may have also played a role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From lifetime studies, the incidence of spontaneous mammary tumors of Sprague-Dawley rats often approaches 50% in control animals, 17 and it usually varies 7-40% in studies from different sources. 18 This indicates that there is likely to be significant genetic variation over time, though dietary, hormonal and physiologic factors may have also played a role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spontaneous mammary tumors develop in females of various strains of rats such as August, Albany-Hooded, Copenhagen, Fisher, Lewis, Osborne-Mendel, SpragueDawley, Wistar, and Wistar/Furth (9,45,116,(119)(120)(121). Mammary tumors are third in incidence among spontaneous tumors found in the Fisher 344 rat used in the National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program (NCI/NTP) carcinogenicity bioassays (116).…”
Section: Spontaneous Rodent Mammary Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from continuously operating cancer registries, such as the one in the state of Connecticut and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program established by the National Cancer Institute in 1973 (which collects data from nine population-based cancer registries covering about 10% of the US population), reveal that the age-adjusted incidence of breast cancer rose at a rate of 1.2%/year from 1940 to 1980; it rose even more steeply in the next 7 years, reaching a peak of 112.4 cases/100,000 women in 1987, although it decreased to 104.6 cases/100,000 women by 1989 (3)(4)(5). The increased incidence of cancer has been pardy attributed to an improvement in early detection, as indicated by the progressively increased percentage of patients with early stage (0 to I) disease (from 45.2% in 1985-1986 to 53.1% in 1991) and decreased percentage of patients in stage II and III disease (6). Early diagnosis has improved the rates of cure and prolonged survival; however, stage-specific survival rates have increased only slightly since the mid1970s, and breast cancer remains only second to lung cancer as a cause of death, causing 46,000 deaths in 1994 (3)(4)(5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Osteosarcoma was observed in the tibia, femur, lumbar vertebra, coxal bone, pubis/ischium, rib or thoracic vertebra (Table 7). Although osteosarcoma was also observed in the tibia in 1 animal in the 4.5 μg/kg group, this finding was considered to be spontaneous since spontaneous occurrence of osteosarcoma in SD rats has been reported (Imai and Yoshimura, 1988;Mac Kenzie and Garner, 1973;Nagayabu et al, 2000) and osteosarcoma was also observed in 1 animal each in the vehicle control group in Studies-3 and 4. No bone neoplasms other than osteosarcoma were observed in any group.…”
Section: Study-2mentioning
confidence: 83%