2015
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2015.1029655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Near Coastal Significant Wave Height Measurements from SARAL/AltiKa with Wave Rider Buoys in the Indian Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They got a much better sampling from SARAL/AltiKa (more data available), and comparisons with local tide gauges showed a better agreement than with Jason-2, both for correlation (0.7 vs. 0.54) and RMS error (3.3 vs. 4.2 cm). Hareef Baba Shaed et al (2015) compared significant wave heights (SWH) from SARAL/AltiKa with wave buoy measurements along the coasts of India and found correlations ranging from 0.85 to 0.98 and RMS errors lower than 0.4 m.…”
Section: Ka-band Altimetry: Altikamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They got a much better sampling from SARAL/AltiKa (more data available), and comparisons with local tide gauges showed a better agreement than with Jason-2, both for correlation (0.7 vs. 0.54) and RMS error (3.3 vs. 4.2 cm). Hareef Baba Shaed et al (2015) compared significant wave heights (SWH) from SARAL/AltiKa with wave buoy measurements along the coasts of India and found correlations ranging from 0.85 to 0.98 and RMS errors lower than 0.4 m.…”
Section: Ka-band Altimetry: Altikamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus not surprising that it has been only scarcely used to validate model results in the Baltic Sea (Cieślikiewicz et al, 2008;Tuomi et al, 2011). With certain precaution, it has shown good results for basins such as the Mediterranean Sea (Cavaleri and Sclavo, 2006;Galanis et al, 2012), a nearshore region of the Indian Ocean (Hareef Baba Shaeb et al, 2015;Patra and Bhaskaran, 2016), and for a range of regional seas such as the China Sea (Kong et al, 2016), the Arabian Sea (Hithin et al, 2015), the Chukchi Sea (Francis et al, 2011) or the German Bight (Passaro et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus not surprising that it has been only scarcely used to validate model results in the Baltic Sea (Cieślikiewicz et al, 2008;Tuomi et al, 2011). With certain precautions in place, it has shown good results for basins such as the Mediterranean Sea (Cavaleri and Sclavo, 2006;Galanis et al, 2012), a nearshore region of the Indian Ocean (Hareef Baba Shaeb et al, 2015;Patra and Bhaskaran, 2016), and for a range of regional seas such as the China Sea (Kong et al, 2016), the Arabian Sea (Hithin et al, 2015), the Chukchi Sea (Francis et al, 2011), or the German Bight (Passaro et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%