2021
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1933647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of nature of science representations in five Chinese high school physics textbooks

Abstract: Formal understanding of the nature of science (NOS) has been considered to be a major contributor to nurturing students' scientific literacy. In China, this view has been endorsed in the new standard for high school physics curriculum, which has guided the development of the new generation physics textbooks. Following the analytical framework established in the recent literature, this study evaluates the NOS representations in five textbooks approved by the Chinese Ministry of Education regarding the extent, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study on representations of NOS in the science curriculum in Norway showed that social values and scientific practices are emphasized in the curriculum (Mork et al, 2022), which contrasts with other related studies. NOS aspects have also been included explicitly in the science curriculum in China, however, the majority of the NOS aspects are represented implicitly in five textbooks analyzed and the 'scientific method' is inconsistently or poorly represented in three of the five books (Zhuang et al, 2021). Furthermore, Olson (2018) revealed that NOS aspects rarely occurred from standards documents of nine diverse countries (Australia, Canada, Colombia, Indonesia, Lebanon, Mexico, Thailand, South Africa, and the USA), with the notable exception of Australia.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study on representations of NOS in the science curriculum in Norway showed that social values and scientific practices are emphasized in the curriculum (Mork et al, 2022), which contrasts with other related studies. NOS aspects have also been included explicitly in the science curriculum in China, however, the majority of the NOS aspects are represented implicitly in five textbooks analyzed and the 'scientific method' is inconsistently or poorly represented in three of the five books (Zhuang et al, 2021). Furthermore, Olson (2018) revealed that NOS aspects rarely occurred from standards documents of nine diverse countries (Australia, Canada, Colombia, Indonesia, Lebanon, Mexico, Thailand, South Africa, and the USA), with the notable exception of Australia.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies of textbook analysis tend to explore the concept of learning and how the idea was integrated, nontextual elements in textbooks, visual representations, learning content, or commentary of learning texts [18]. Research on science textbooks mainly investigates science literacy, especially in the Nature of Science (NOS) [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Icmscementioning
confidence: 99%
“…NOS has been mentioned in science curriculum documents in relation to scientific literacy for the past 20 years. Chinese science-based curricula emphasize a shift from knowledge to scientific literacy (Wei and Thomas, 2005), and some aspects of NOS are explicitly or implicitly represented in science textbooks (Zhuang et al, 2021). NOS is emphasized in official curriculum documents, though senior high schools adopt a separate science curriculum (MOE, 2017).…”
Section: Nature Of Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%