2008
DOI: 10.1253/circj.72.1079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Myocardial Bridging by Dual-Source CT With Conventional Coronary Angiography

Abstract: In the present study, DSCT detected more MBs than CAG, suggesting its clinical application for diagnosis of this condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of muscle overlying a segment of a coronary artery on MDCT is helpful for diag nosis and evaluation of MB. 15 The location of the MB in our study was most commonly in the midLAD, in concordance with previous reports. 6,8 Generally, the incidence of MB is between 0.5% and 2.5% angiographically and between 15% and 85% pathologically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The detection of muscle overlying a segment of a coronary artery on MDCT is helpful for diag nosis and evaluation of MB. 15 The location of the MB in our study was most commonly in the midLAD, in concordance with previous reports. 6,8 Generally, the incidence of MB is between 0.5% and 2.5% angiographically and between 15% and 85% pathologically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Interestingly, IVUS studies have shown that despite the strong association between MB and endothelial dysfunction, bridging segments are relatively spared from atherosclerotic plaque formation [5]. However, non-invasive imaging may detect the existence of MB even better than coronary angiography with lower risks for general patients [6,7]. Although there are now several publications on MB in patients who underwent multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of the heart, most studies had a small sample size (<300-400).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MD-CT is accepted as a reliable and sensitive tool for the diagnosis of MB and the evaluation of associated intracoronary hemodynamics. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The purpose of this article is to briefly review the literature and to analyze information concerning the prevalence, anatomic features, pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic options associated with MB. We also review the classical appearance on various imaging modalities, with a particular emphasis on MDCT coronary angiography using 64-slice MDCT and dualsource CT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%