2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00176-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibility testing performed with BACTEC 460TB (Becton Dickinson) and MB/BacT (Organon Teknika) systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observations are similar to those of Beer et al (1997 a, b), Diaz-Infantes et al (2000), Brunello and Fontana (2000), Tortoli et al (2000), and Yew et al (2001), using the same systems. The results of the tests in the MB/BacT indicate that this system is an accurate method for use in public health laboratories to deal with the workload of susceptibility-testing routines to diagnose multidrugresistant tuberculosis mainly in those states that the prevalence of the disease is high and where the laboratories act as a reference facility to the national network.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our observations are similar to those of Beer et al (1997 a, b), Diaz-Infantes et al (2000), Brunello and Fontana (2000), Tortoli et al (2000), and Yew et al (2001), using the same systems. The results of the tests in the MB/BacT indicate that this system is an accurate method for use in public health laboratories to deal with the workload of susceptibility-testing routines to diagnose multidrugresistant tuberculosis mainly in those states that the prevalence of the disease is high and where the laboratories act as a reference facility to the national network.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our experiments, all readings of the tests in the MB/BacT were made for a few more days than in BACTEC. This small difference in the final reading test time compared to the BACTEC was also observed by Tortoli et al (2000). The availability of the susceptibility results obtained in our study is within the time limit suggested by Tenover et al (1993) for rapid intervention in the disease transmission chain, acceptable for public health laboratories in this era of TBMDR: no more than 30 days should pass from collection of the clinical material to the time that the results become available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Two other commercial and automated methods for DST are the MB/BacT system (Organon Technika) and the ESP culture system II (Accumed International, Chicago, IL, USA). Both systems rely on heavy equipment and have also been evaluated in several studies [71,72].…”
Section: Phenotypic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74,94 The radiometric Bactec 460 and also the automated nonradiometric liquid culture systems also allow susceptibility testing. [95][96][97][98] Reductions in turnaround times from 21 days for LJ-based tests to 6-12 days for automated liquid culture systems for susceptibility testing have been reported. 98,99 The liquid culture methods are expensive, however, and require elaborate technology.…”
Section: Rapid Liquid Culture Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%