1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(98)00044-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Muscle Volume Between Congenital and Acquired Superior Oblique Palsies by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be recognized that muscle force has two separate components: active contractile force controlled by innervation, and passive elastic force determined by stiffness and muscle stretching. 31 In the present study as well as in previous studies, 8,10 MRI demonstrated that about half of the subjects exhibited a normal cross-sectional size. Demer 10 reported that the pattern of binocular misalignment observed in such cases is explainable by passive elastic abnormalities of the SO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It must be recognized that muscle force has two separate components: active contractile force controlled by innervation, and passive elastic force determined by stiffness and muscle stretching. 31 In the present study as well as in previous studies, 8,10 MRI demonstrated that about half of the subjects exhibited a normal cross-sectional size. Demer 10 reported that the pattern of binocular misalignment observed in such cases is explainable by passive elastic abnormalities of the SO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…13,56,57 On the basis of the present results, it would be anticipated that appropriate orbital MRI in humans would demonstrate neurogenic atrophy of the deep SO belly within 5 weeks of denervation. The fine time scale of this prediction remains to be confirmed in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, the present study found the SO to be smaller in congenital than in acquired SO palsy, confirming the report of Sato et al . 28 This difference in SO size may be due to the different etiologies, with the smaller SO in congenital palsy perhaps caused either by primary hypoplasia or by denervation atrophy, 27, 29, 37, 38 but the latter perhaps the sole cause in acquired palsy. 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%