2012
DOI: 10.1002/jms.3051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of multiple API techniques for the simultaneous detection of microconstituents in water by on‐line SPE‐LC‐MS/MS

Abstract: This study described a fully automated method using on-line solid phase extraction of large volume injections coupled with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to simultaneously detect a group of recalcitrant microconstituents (pharmaceuticals and personal care products, steroid hormones and sterols) in aqueous matrices. Samples (1 mL to 20 mL) were loaded to the preconcentration column at 1 mL/min, and the column was washed with 1000 μL of 25% methanol in LC/MS wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(132 reference statements)
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed concentrations for trimethoprim, caffeine, sulfamethoxazole, diphenhydramine, diltiazem, carbamazepine, erythromycin, and fluoxetine in reclaimed water were higher than those in previous reports [8,9] in which reclaimed water was directly drawn from irrigational sprinklers. The mechanism for the loss in the reclaimed water drawn from sprinklers is unclear but is likely the result of different input sources.…”
Section: Results and Disscussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The observed concentrations for trimethoprim, caffeine, sulfamethoxazole, diphenhydramine, diltiazem, carbamazepine, erythromycin, and fluoxetine in reclaimed water were higher than those in previous reports [8,9] in which reclaimed water was directly drawn from irrigational sprinklers. The mechanism for the loss in the reclaimed water drawn from sprinklers is unclear but is likely the result of different input sources.…”
Section: Results and Disscussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The calculated MDL for most analytes was o5 ng/L with only four compounds (benzophenone, benzotriazole, bisphenol A, and norgestrel) being 4 10 ng/L. The MDLs in this study (Table 2) were comparable and in most cases lower than previously published literature while using lower sample volumes of 1.7 mL [33,42]. A further advantage of using low sample volume was that the mass of isotopically-labeled standard added to each sample was much lower when compared to other published methods.…”
Section: Limit Of Detection (Lod) and Methods Detection Limit (Mdl)supporting
confidence: 39%
“…However, most of these methods have focused on analysis of specific classes of TOrC such as pharmaceuticals [28][29][30], hormones [24,31] or pesticides [32] only. Other methods still require multiple injections for analysis of all analytes [33], large sample volumes [34], require derivitization [35], or are not completely automated which may reduce the reproducibility and/or increase time of analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are typically used for small (<1000 u) molecules that are not sufficiently polar for efficient ionization by electrospray ionization (ESI). However, APPI is generally perceived to be more efficient for low polarity compounds than APCI, as has been shown for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [5], triterpenes [6], certain steroids [7], and pharmaceuticals [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%