2022
DOI: 10.33330/jurteksi.v8i3.1482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Multilayer Perceptron’s Activation and Op-Timization Functions in Classification of Covid-19 Patients

Abstract: Patient’s symptoms could be used as features in Covid-19 classification. Using multi layer perceptron, the classification uses data set that contains patient’s diagnosis which has Covid-19 symptoms dan processes the data set to see if the patient is Covid-19 positive or not. This paper compare four activation function such as identity, logistic, ReLu and tanh and combined them with optimizer such as L-BFGS-B, SGD and Adam. Using 5-fold and 10-fold cross validation technique to get the accuracy, F1, precision a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we use 5-fold, 10-fold, and 20-fold crossvalidation to analyze the models' performance. We use the accuracy, precision, and recall values to rank each model, using formulas as shown in equations (3) to (5) [30]. Where: TP (true positive) is the number of positive-class data predicted correctly; TN (true negative) is the total negativeclass data predicted correctly; FP (false positive) is the number of positive-class data incorrectly predicted; FN (false negative) is the number of negative-class data incorrectly predicted [31].…”
Section: E Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we use 5-fold, 10-fold, and 20-fold crossvalidation to analyze the models' performance. We use the accuracy, precision, and recall values to rank each model, using formulas as shown in equations (3) to (5) [30]. Where: TP (true positive) is the number of positive-class data predicted correctly; TN (true negative) is the total negativeclass data predicted correctly; FP (false positive) is the number of positive-class data incorrectly predicted; FN (false negative) is the number of negative-class data incorrectly predicted [31].…”
Section: E Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this grouping are used as targets in the classification process using the six models of the RF algorithm, consisting of a different number of trees, with Table III showing the model's configuration. After obtaining the classification results using the above models, we evaluate each model's performance according to the accuracy, precision, and recall values using equations ( 2) to (4) [28].…”
Section: Sentiment Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the classification results produced by the two models designed, we use the 10-fold cross-validation to generate the actual and predicted result in a confusion matrix table. Based on the comparison values in the confusion matrix output, we calculate the accuracy, precision, and recall values using equations ( 4) to ( 6) and use them as a reference to evaluate the classification results of each model [28]. The model that produces the highest values is the model concluded as the model with the best classification performance.. R ESULTS A ND D ISCUSSIONS From the data collection using the Twitter API and the "#blokirkominfo" keyword, we got 1000 tweets that fulfilled the keywords.…”
Section: G Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%