2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-021-00321-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of multiforce nickel–titanium wires to multistrand wires without force zones in bending and torque measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study by L. Lombardo et al [ 14 ] performed on several multi-force orthodontic archwires (Ni-Ti Bio-Active GC ® ); Ni-Ti MultiForce Bio-Vis (ACME ® ) and (MultiForce Bio-Vis, ACME ® ) found that the frontal segment released 0.6N(63 cN); the premolar 1.09 N (109 cN) and the molar 1.28 N (128 cN). Sanders et al [ 13 ] compare rectangular multi-force nickel-titanium wires with rectangular wires with one force zone. In their study, they used the Orthodontic Measuring and Simulation System.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study by L. Lombardo et al [ 14 ] performed on several multi-force orthodontic archwires (Ni-Ti Bio-Active GC ® ); Ni-Ti MultiForce Bio-Vis (ACME ® ) and (MultiForce Bio-Vis, ACME ® ) found that the frontal segment released 0.6N(63 cN); the premolar 1.09 N (109 cN) and the molar 1.28 N (128 cN). Sanders et al [ 13 ] compare rectangular multi-force nickel-titanium wires with rectangular wires with one force zone. In their study, they used the Orthodontic Measuring and Simulation System.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the research of the orthodontic literature [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], we found that the information is insufficient for the multi-force archwires TriTanium ® and Bio-Active ® , used in clinical orthodontic practice (in-vivo use). When choosing an appropriate archwire for a certain stage of orthodontic treatment with a fixed technique, information about the mechanical properties is of the utmost importance for the practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the authors did not recommend the use of the tested multizone wires for tooth displacements more than 1.5 mm. 19 Another study demonstrated a force difference between the posterior and anterior segments of multizone archwires to be at least 45%. 34 Additionally, the present investigation compared new and retrieved wire pieces.…”
Section: Three-point Bending Test and Ebmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sample size was calculated based on a recent in vitro experiment, which measured the differences in the force magnitude between the posterior and the anterior segments of similar wires. 19 The results showed that a sample of four pairs of measurements would be required for the test to detect the resulting difference with a power of 80%. However, the present study mea- https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod22.183 sured a total number of 12 retrieved and new wires.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Franco et al 2015) Sanders en 2021 en su estudio por averiguar la efectividad de expresión de torque, incluyo 1 brackets de autoligado pasivo, 1 de autoligado activo y 1 de ligadura convencional elastomérica, determinó que el torque logró una mayor expresión en los brackets de autoligado activo y en los convencionales a los que se les coloco ligadura metálica en comparación con los brackets de autoligado pasivo, además de que los dos primeros no mostraron juego torsional. (Sanders et al 2021) Badawi en 2008 comparo la efectividad de expresión del torque entre 1 brackets de autoligado activo y 1 autoligado pasivo, en donde determino que existe mayor eficacia por parte de los brackets de autoligado activo en cuanto a la expresión del torque, además de que el rango de activación del torque para los activos es mayor que para los pasivos debido a que su tapa presiona el arco. (Badawi et al 2008)…”
Section: Brackets De Autoligado Pasivounclassified