2017
DOI: 10.2166/nh.2017.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of multi-gene genetic programming and dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system in modeling pan evaporation

Abstract: Accurately modeling pan evaporation is important in water resources planning and management and also in environmental engineering. This study compares the accuracy of two new data-driven methods, multi-gene genetic programming (MGGP) approach and dynamic evolving neural-fuzzy inference system (DENFIS), in modeling monthly pan evaporation. The climatic data, namely, minimum temperature, maximum temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, wind speed, and pan evaporation, obtained from Antakya and Antalya st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where M i and E i are the modeled and experimented d s /L values, respectively, and M and E are the mean modeled and experimented d s /L values, respectively. Recently, a new goodness-of-fit index was defined by Eray et al [67] as combined accuracy (CA). It is a combination of RMSE, MAE, and R 2 as follows:…”
Section: The Goodness Of Fit Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M i and E i are the modeled and experimented d s /L values, respectively, and M and E are the mean modeled and experimented d s /L values, respectively. Recently, a new goodness-of-fit index was defined by Eray et al [67] as combined accuracy (CA). It is a combination of RMSE, MAE, and R 2 as follows:…”
Section: The Goodness Of Fit Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, numerous methods and experimental relationships have been developed for indirectly simulating evaporation [9,10]. Over the years, various studies have sought to identify linear experimental relationships [11][12][13] and non-linear experimental relationships [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] as indirect methods to simulate evaporation from free water surfaces. Some of these experimental relationships are listed in Table S1 in Supplementary Material (SM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model performance in estimating the regional GR2M model parameters was compared using four statistical indices, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r), and Combined Accuracy (CA) 47 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%