Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of MSL RCS jet computations with flow visualization and velocimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, quantitative measurements of laminar and laminar-unsteady hypersonic boundary layer behavior, [5][6][7] reaction control system (RCS) jet behavior in wake flows, 5,6,8,9 and facility characterization 10 were of particular interest. Since these types of experiments were to be made in flows with both a steady and unsteady nature, the quantitative measurements to be used required the ability to probe the flowfield with relatively high spatial and temporal accuracy and precision.…”
Section: B Single-laser No Mtv With a Double-frame Cameramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, quantitative measurements of laminar and laminar-unsteady hypersonic boundary layer behavior, [5][6][7] reaction control system (RCS) jet behavior in wake flows, 5,6,8,9 and facility characterization 10 were of particular interest. Since these types of experiments were to be made in flows with both a steady and unsteady nature, the quantitative measurements to be used required the ability to probe the flowfield with relatively high spatial and temporal accuracy and precision.…”
Section: B Single-laser No Mtv With a Double-frame Cameramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] It is important to collect experimental data on complex flowfields such as this one to help validate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. 15,16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%