2022
DOI: 10.47391/jpma.20-721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of MRCP and ERCP findings: a retrospective secondary data analysis

Abstract: Objective: To compare the findings of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyin patients presenting with bile duct disorders. Methodology: The retrospective secondary-data study was conducted at the Gastroenterology Department of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan,and comprised data of patients who presented with bile duct disordersfrom June2019 to May2020. Data was analysed using SPSS 25. Results: Of the 92 patients, 41(44.6%) were males and 51(55.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the findings of MRCP and ERCP, MRCP was found to have high diagnostic accuracy for bile duct stone (89.3%). 7 Our study adds further evidence to support the role of MRCP prior to ERCP as it is an independent predictor of choledocholithiasis at ERCP in patients with suspected filling defects on IOC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Comparing the findings of MRCP and ERCP, MRCP was found to have high diagnostic accuracy for bile duct stone (89.3%). 7 Our study adds further evidence to support the role of MRCP prior to ERCP as it is an independent predictor of choledocholithiasis at ERCP in patients with suspected filling defects on IOC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…They reported the sensitivity of MRCP for malignant lesions as 92%. 19 Jagtap N et al studied MRCP and ERCP for their sensitivity for choledocholithiasis detection and shared the results as 80% and 90% respectively. 20 Hanif et al compared MRCP and ERCP for their sensitivity in pathologies of hepatopancreato biliary tract and reported it as 91% and 82% respectively with a p-value of >0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, there is no speci c diagnostic model for malignant CCA combined with endoscopic and clinical laboratory data [2,17] . Therefore, we aimed to construct a predictive model employing RF algorithms for CCA and develop a public online nomogram platform to improve endoscopic prognosis [3,8,9] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%