1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.47.2742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Monte Carlo and diagrammatic calculations for the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Abstract: Monte Carlo results for a two-dimensional Hubbard model in the intermediate-coupling regime U =4t are compared with a diagrammatic spin-fluctuation approximation.Simulations on an 8X8 lattice doped away from half filling were carried out down to temperatures of order -'o of the bandwidth. Results for the spin susceptibility y(q, ice ), the electron self-energy X(p, ice"), various pair-field susceptibilities, and the irreducible particle-particle scattering vertex l (p,ico"~p,ito") were obtained. A random-phase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

12
74
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
12
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3(d)) compared with the RPA (with full χ zz ) result. Our finding at U = 4 is in good agreement with the work of Bulut et al [14], which shows that the effective particle-particle interaction created by the Hubbard U increases with lowering temperature and can reach large values. Figure 4 gives for both the intermediate (U = 4) and strong correlation (U = 8) cases the doping dependence of the susceptibility χ zz (q), of the renormalization factor |γ(p, q)| 2 , and of the effective pairing interaction V (p, q).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…3(d)) compared with the RPA (with full χ zz ) result. Our finding at U = 4 is in good agreement with the work of Bulut et al [14], which shows that the effective particle-particle interaction created by the Hubbard U increases with lowering temperature and can reach large values. Figure 4 gives for both the intermediate (U = 4) and strong correlation (U = 8) cases the doping dependence of the susceptibility χ zz (q), of the renormalization factor |γ(p, q)| 2 , and of the effective pairing interaction V (p, q).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…These low-energy spin excitations near (π, π) also may be integral to pairing in a broad class of superconductors 2 , and their doping evolution will thus be well captured by both computational methods. We note that this value forŪ falls within the range of values obtained in previous studies 5,9,10 ; however, one should note again that for the chosen set of parameters the undoped, single-band Hubbard model possesses a Mott insulating ground state, and should not be viewed as weakly correlated. The expression for χ RPA c does not contain a new pole, so its behavior is primarily determined by that of χ 0 and thus set by the noninteracting bandstructure.…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…While some tests of the GW [24,25], TMA [25,26], or FLEX [27] approaches have been published, we still lack a clear picture about the importance of the different diagram classes, and the beneficial or detrimental effect of self-consistent partial resummations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%