2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of monoamine and corticosterone levels 24 h following (+)methamphetamine, (+/–)3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine, cocaine, (+)fenfluramine or (+/–)methylphenidate administration in the neonatal rat

Abstract: We have previously shown that neonatal administration of (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and (+)fenfluramine produce deficits in spatial and path integration learning, whereas (+)methamphetamine causes deficits in spatial learning. Conversely, cocaine and (+/-)methylphenidate have no effect on either form of learning following neonatal administration. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether corticosterone and/or monoamine levels were changed following subcutaneous administration of 10 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is known that activation of D 1 receptors in other brain regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex also play a role in motor inhibition (Diaz et al 2004; Heijtz et al 2007; Pellis et al 2006). Therefore, we suggest that early Meth treatment sensitizes DA D 1 receptors while desensitizing D 2 receptors (Crawford et al 2003; Schaefer et al 2006, 2008; Williams et al 2003 a ). Whether the smaller D 2 receptor change was a direct effect of Meth exposure or an indirect effect via the Meth-induced change in D 1 receptor sensitivity cannot be determined from the present data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it is known that activation of D 1 receptors in other brain regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex also play a role in motor inhibition (Diaz et al 2004; Heijtz et al 2007; Pellis et al 2006). Therefore, we suggest that early Meth treatment sensitizes DA D 1 receptors while desensitizing D 2 receptors (Crawford et al 2003; Schaefer et al 2006, 2008; Williams et al 2003 a ). Whether the smaller D 2 receptor change was a direct effect of Meth exposure or an indirect effect via the Meth-induced change in D 1 receptor sensitivity cannot be determined from the present data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Less is known about the receptor alterations following early Meth exposure, as the aforementioned data are gleaned from adult rodent studies and short-term changes in DA levels are not reported to occur during PD 11–20 drug administration (Schaefer et al 2006, 2008). Interestingly, the findings in the present study indicate that the D 1 and D 2 receptors show lasting functional changes following developmental Meth treatment although we did not directly assay receptor number or affinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No effects on dopamine were observed in the striatum; however, there were reductions in DOPAC seen at 6, 24, and 30 h after the first dose . The 24 h reductions in 5-HT and 5-HIAA were replicated in a subsequent study (Schaefer et al, 2006). After behavioral testing (approximately P105), the study by Broening et al (2001) examined monoamine levels in adult animals exposed to 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg twice a day of MDMA from either P1 to P10 or P11 to P20.…”
Section: Biochemistrymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A possible mechanism involving 5-HT signaling, however, does exist. First, recent data showed that after MDMA exposure on P11, hippocampal 5-HT levels drop sharply Schaefer et al 2006). Second, MDMA treatment from P11-20 increases 5-HT 1A receptor activity in the hippocampus (Crawford et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%