2010
DOI: 10.2747/1548-1603.47.3.360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of MODIS fPAR Products with Landsat-5 TM-Derived fPAR over Semiarid Rangelands of Idaho

Abstract: While validation of the MODIS fPAR product is well behind that of the LAI product, it is recently receiving more attention. In this study, MODIS fPAR and Landsat-5 TM-derived fPAR (TM fPAR) were calculated and quantitatively compared using imagery from 2005 to 2008 for the semiarid rangelands of Idaho, USA. fPAR change maps were calculated between active growth and late-summer senescence periods. Accuracy of the MODIS fPAR and TM fPAR were determined indirectly by incorporating field-based measurements of abov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, following a similar approach, the method can be adapted to produce sequences of synthetic images for other ecosystem variables, provided that they can be calculated from both moderate-and medium-resolution resolution instruments. Examples include additional vegetation indices, leaf area index [72], fraction of photosynthetically active radiation [73][74][75][76], albedo [77], net primary productivity, snow, water and burn indices, etc. This approach is pixel-based, does not require parameter tuning and can be implemented independently of the number of existing medium-resolution images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, following a similar approach, the method can be adapted to produce sequences of synthetic images for other ecosystem variables, provided that they can be calculated from both moderate-and medium-resolution resolution instruments. Examples include additional vegetation indices, leaf area index [72], fraction of photosynthetically active radiation [73][74][75][76], albedo [77], net primary productivity, snow, water and burn indices, etc. This approach is pixel-based, does not require parameter tuning and can be implemented independently of the number of existing medium-resolution images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is not feasible to apply the groundbased methods to measure FPAR across large landscapes [9]. Even at some regional scales, these methods are also difficult to use to measure FPAR for studying spatial patterns of FPAR [10]. Remote sensing provides an alternative and unique method to obtain repeated, rapid and inexpensive estimates of FPAR over large areas [6,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of BP is that, unlike most VI, they do not depend on variables such as geometry of illumination or sensor characteristics. They are then often considered as very good candidates to replace classical vegetation indices for characterizing and monitoring green vegetation [31][32][33][34]. The parameters exploited here are presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Computing Vegetation Indices and Biophysical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%