2012
DOI: 10.4103/0975-2870.103323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of modified Petroff′s and N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide methods for sputum decontamination in tertiary care hospital in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, smear positive culture-negative specimens can be resulted from Laboratory errors, prolonged specimen decontamination, shortened incubation times of culture, cross-contamination of smears, using water or stains contaminated with acid-fast organisms or obtaining samples from patients under antimycobacterial therapy (Dunlap et al, 2000). Sharma et al (2012) reported that culture positivity obtained by modified Petroff's method (46.7%) were less Male 3 6 9 18 7 14 1 2 20 40 Female 10 20 16 32 2 4 2 4 30 60 Total 13 26 25 50 9 18 3 6 50 100 *Percentage was correlated to the total number of tuberculosis patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, smear positive culture-negative specimens can be resulted from Laboratory errors, prolonged specimen decontamination, shortened incubation times of culture, cross-contamination of smears, using water or stains contaminated with acid-fast organisms or obtaining samples from patients under antimycobacterial therapy (Dunlap et al, 2000). Sharma et al (2012) reported that culture positivity obtained by modified Petroff's method (46.7%) were less Male 3 6 9 18 7 14 1 2 20 40 Female 10 20 16 32 2 4 2 4 30 60 Total 13 26 25 50 9 18 3 6 50 100 *Percentage was correlated to the total number of tuberculosis patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The concentration of chemical substance of the decontaminant and time contact to bacilli is a crucial factor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis' recovery. 2,10,13 The higher concentration the more toxic to the bacilli's cells, whatever the chemical substance used to decontaminate, it is still have probability to kill a number of TB bacilli. 2,14,15 As a number of bacilliin (+1) AFB is lower than (+2) and (+3) and the bleach concentration and time contact doesn't change, it can make the recovery capability in (+1) AFB is lower too.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,9 NALC is a good agent as mucolytic, but not as decontaminant, this factor could lead the capability of NALC-NaOH in recovery rate is weaker than Bleach NaOH NALC Bleach Oxalic bleach or NaOH and mask the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. 2,6,10 Based on the number of contamination rate, 5% oxalic acid that had low number of positivity rate was also had a great number in contamination. The contamination that happened in oxalic group, could be because oxalic acid is a poor decontaminant for fungi and Gram positive bacteria as both are abundant flora in oropharyngeal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All specimens were handled in a negative pressure environment as per the international standards for biosafety and infection control for MTB. For three consecutive mornings sputum samples from each patient were collected in properly labeled screw cap disposable plastic bottles and were decontaminated using N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium citrate-sodium-hydroxide (NALC-NaOH) procedure [12]. Sputum samples were processed and stained for Acid…”
Section: Collection Of Mtb Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%