Advanced Methods in the Evaluation of Nuclear Scattering Data
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-15990-8_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of model-independent optical potential analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be proved that in this constrained fit, if γ is sufficiently large, the small eigenvalues of the error matrix disappear and the error matrix becomes well conditioned. The details can be found, for example, in [188,193] in which the MSR was applied to α- 40 Ca elastic scattering at E α = 104 MeV, fitting the high-precision data of Gils et al [194]. In [188] the data were first roughly fitted with a conventional WS potential which becomes the a priori input potential with a definite b (0) .…”
Section: Comparison Of Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be proved that in this constrained fit, if γ is sufficiently large, the small eigenvalues of the error matrix disappear and the error matrix becomes well conditioned. The details can be found, for example, in [188,193] in which the MSR was applied to α- 40 Ca elastic scattering at E α = 104 MeV, fitting the high-precision data of Gils et al [194]. In [188] the data were first roughly fitted with a conventional WS potential which becomes the a priori input potential with a definite b (0) .…”
Section: Comparison Of Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%