2014
DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Microtia Reconstruction Outcomes Using Rib Cartilage vs Porous Polyethylene Implant

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Auricular reconstruction is a unique blend of cosmesis and functionality. The choice of the optimal framework material to use is an important decision for the patient with microtia.OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare the outcomes of reconstruction of microtia using porous polyethylene implants and rib cartilage grafts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
75
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they may lead to complications such as infection and extrusion of the implant (Hwan Wang et al, ; Sevin et al, ). A study using polyethylene implants showed better cosmetic appearance of ear but possess a higher risk for infection and extrusion (Constantine, Gilmore, Lee, & Leach, ). As a consequence, there continues to search for alternative materials (Mandl et al, ; Rotter et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they may lead to complications such as infection and extrusion of the implant (Hwan Wang et al, ; Sevin et al, ). A study using polyethylene implants showed better cosmetic appearance of ear but possess a higher risk for infection and extrusion (Constantine, Gilmore, Lee, & Leach, ). As a consequence, there continues to search for alternative materials (Mandl et al, ; Rotter et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11e13 Due to this, artificial implants or prosthetics are considered an option in adult patients; however, these methods are limited by complications such as extrusion and infection and the absence of long-term follow-up results. 14,15 To the best of our knowledge, there are few large published series on the use of autologous rib cartilage grafts in patients >20 years for auricular reconstruction, including objective evaluation and patient satisfaction with surgical results. In this article, we retrospectively reviewed a series of 84 adult patients (!20 years) who had favorable outcomes using autologous rib cartilage grafts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extrusion rates of MEDPOR frameworks operated by experienced surgeons might be small, follow-up studies show higher rates than in autogenous reconstruction. 32 Good coverage of MEDPOR with superficial temporal fascia is important for healing and resistance to microtrauma. However, if the implant is exposed due to injury or local infection, the risk of persistent infection and ultimately extrusion of the implant, in contrast to autogenous cartilage, is high.…”
Section: The Future and Alternatives To Autogenous Ear Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%