2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of microparticles produced with combinations of gelatin, chitosan and gum Arabic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This characteristic is obtained when CH and GA are used stoichiometrically with similar charges (+/−) given by their –COO- and –NH 3 + groups. This behavior has been reported by other authors using CH:GA ratios in the range of 1:2.45–1:5 (pH 3.5–5.5) [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. In some cases, CCs did not form efficiently and instead formed thin fibrils.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This characteristic is obtained when CH and GA are used stoichiometrically with similar charges (+/−) given by their –COO- and –NH 3 + groups. This behavior has been reported by other authors using CH:GA ratios in the range of 1:2.45–1:5 (pH 3.5–5.5) [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. In some cases, CCs did not form efficiently and instead formed thin fibrils.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It has been reported that the lowest electrostatic attraction between CH and GA, generated by the neutralization of the electric charges of their functional groups, occurs with a CH:GA ratio of 1:5 [ 45 ]. Therefore, at CH:GA ratios >1:5, the charge balance between the molecules is lost, which decreases the performance of the CCs [ 26 , 28 , 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The negative charge of the gum Arabic decreases along with the decrease in pH value of the solution [30] due to the protonation of the carboxylic groups of the gum Arabic [31]. Goncalves et al [32] have proved that at acidic conditions, the negative zeta potential of gum Arabic decreases from around -20 at pH 6 to around -10 at pH 3, and this continues along with a decreasing pH value. Therefore, reduction of the positive charge of chitosan due to be used in the crosslinking process, does not influence the zeta potential of the nano-chitosan because of the contribution of the protonated gum Arabic.…”
Section: Zeta Potential and Ph Value Of Nano-chitosan Prepared With Dmentioning
confidence: 99%