2008
DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements

Abstract: Background: In nuclear medicine, liquid radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are administered to patients by using various types of syringes with different volumes. The activity of each "dose" must be carefully measured and documented prior to administration using an activity calibrator.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 223 Ra activity was measured using the radionuclide calibrator PET DOSE (Comecer) following the procedures in [ 13 , 14 ]. For each patient, activity time curves were determined using antero-posterior and postero-anterior 30 min planar images acquired at 2–4, 18–24 h and 7 days after the each 223 Ra administration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 223 Ra activity was measured using the radionuclide calibrator PET DOSE (Comecer) following the procedures in [ 13 , 14 ]. For each patient, activity time curves were determined using antero-posterior and postero-anterior 30 min planar images acquired at 2–4, 18–24 h and 7 days after the each 223 Ra administration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore ionization chambers must be calibrated for each volume. Ionization chamber efficiency variation with radioactive solution volume has been experimentally observed [2,34,46,49,[51][52][53][54][55][56]. The ionization chamber efficiency variation is typically less sensitive to volume variation for radionuclides that emit high energy photons like 56 Co or 18 F [57] than for radionuclides that emit low energy photons like 111 In, 133 Ba or 125 I [53] or beta emitters [56,[58][59][60].…”
Section: Volume Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, manufacturers supply calibration coefficient for a specific number of sources, thus, the calculation of other sources' correction factors is indispensable to assure the accuracy of the DC response. This task can be performed using various methods such as Monte Carlo Method and some experimental methods that should be selected in accordance with the accuracy required for the assay [3,4,5]. The significance of these factors depends strongly on the radionuclide type: studies suggest that the beta emitters are more sensitive to the container material, as the self-absorption phenomenon is more important for this type of radiation [6,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%