2001
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Methods of Measuring HER-2 in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With High-Dose Chemotherapy

Abstract: These data suggest that the method of measuring HER-2 is important in predicting clinical outcome. HER2 ECD may identify a poor prognosis subgroup of HER-2-positive tumors. Lack of association of HER2 by IHC/FISH with worse outcome suggests that therapy with AFM and/or HDC therapy may be able to overcome the effect of this prognostic factor or it may not be a prognostic factor in this setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
4
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
61
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19] Kim et al 20 reported similar results in assessing HER2 status by IHC. In contrast to our and the previously quoted studies, comparing ECD and HER2 status evaluated by IHC and FISH on primary tumors in patients treated with HD alkylating agents after anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy, Harris et al 22 concluded that ECD only can identify a subset of patients at worse prognosis, while IHC and FISH were not correlated with outcome.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[18][19] Kim et al 20 reported similar results in assessing HER2 status by IHC. In contrast to our and the previously quoted studies, comparing ECD and HER2 status evaluated by IHC and FISH on primary tumors in patients treated with HD alkylating agents after anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy, Harris et al 22 concluded that ECD only can identify a subset of patients at worse prognosis, while IHC and FISH were not correlated with outcome.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these studies showed a worse outcome for HER2-positive patients. [18][19][20][21][22] Overall, these studies included 274 patients with HER2 assessed on the tumor, and the patients were treated with a variety of induction regimens, not including taxanes.…”
Section: Metastatic Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of breast cancer prognosis based on the serum ECD test have been conflicting, with some finding significant correlation [116] and others finding weak or no correlation [230]. In 22 published studies on 4,088 patients, 16 (73%) studies involving 3,458 (85%) of the patients reported a significant correlation of serum HER-2 protein levels with disease recurrence, metastasis, or shorter survival [231][232][233][234][235][236][237][238][239][240][241][242][243][244][245][246][247]. Two studies involving 379 patients reported no significant association of serum levels with prognosis [248,249].…”
Section: Tissue and Serum Enzyme-linked Immunosorbentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies involving 379 patients reported no significant association of serum levels with prognosis [248,249]. Of the 11 studies in which serum HER-2 protein levels were tested for their ability to predict response to therapy, eight (73%) of the studies found that elevated serum HER-2 protein levels predicted therapy resistance [234,[242][243][244][247][248][249], whereas three additional studies did not demonstrate this association [234,249,250]. Serum HER-2 levels have been correlated with shorter survival and the absence of clinical response to hormonal therapy in ER-positive tumors in some studies [239,247], but not in others [249].…”
Section: Tissue and Serum Enzyme-linked Immunosorbentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation